QuickLinks -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No.           )

Filed by the Registrantýo


Filed by a Party other than the Registranto

Check the appropriate box:

o

 

Preliminary Proxy Statement

o

 

Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))

ý

 

Definitive Proxy Statement

o

 

Definitive Additional Materials

o

 

Soliciting Material Pursuant to § 240.14a-11(c) or § 240.14a-12§240.14a-12

White Mountains Insurance Group, Ltd.

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

 

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
     
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

ý

 

No fee required.

o

 

Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(4)(1) and 0-11.
o (1)Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

(2)Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

(3)Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

(4)Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

(5)Total fee paid:


o


Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

o

 

Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.

 

 
1)
(1)

 

Amount Previously Paid:
        

  2)(2) Form, Schedule ofor Registration Statement No.:
        

  3)(3) Filing Party:
        

  4)(4) Date Filed:
        






Persons who are to respond to the collection of information contained in this form are not required to respond unless the form displays a currently valid OMB control number.


Notice of 20032004
Annual General Meeting
of Members and
Proxy Statement


GRAPHICLOGO



Table of Contents

 
 
Page
NOTICE OF 20032004 ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING OF MEMBERS 2

PROXY STATEMENT

 

3
 
PROPOSAL 1:
ELECTION OF THE COMPANY'S DIRECTORS
 

3
  Procedures for Nominating Directors
Corporate Governance

 
7
6
  
Voting Securities and Principal Holders Thereof

 
7
Compensation of Directors
10
  
Compensation of Executive OfficersDirectors

 
11
13
  
Compensation Plansof Executive Officers

 
15
14
  Reports
Compensation Plans


17

Report of the Committees on Executive Compensation

 
16
19
  
Report of the Audit Committee

 
20
24
  
Independent Registered Public Accountant Fees Billed by the Company's Independent Auditor forand Services Performed in 2002

 
20
25
  
Member Return Graph

 
21
26
  
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation in Compensation Decisions

 
22
27
  
Compliance with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act

 
22
27
 
PROPOSAL 2:ELECTION OF DIRECTORS OF SIRIUS INTERNATIONAL INSURANCE CORPORATION


27
 
PROPOSAL 3:ELECTION OF DIRECTORS OF FUND AMERICAN REINSURANCE COMPANY, LTD.LTD AND SCANDINAVIAN REINSURANCE COMPANY LTD

 
22
27
 
PROPOSAL 3:4:
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS TO ANY NEW NON-UNITED STATES OPERATING SUBSIDIARIES
 
22
28
 
PROPOSAL 4:
ISSUANCE OF COMMON SHARES UPON CONVERSION OF CONVERTIBLE PREFERENCE SHARES23
PROPOSAL 5:TECHNICAL AMENDMENTS TO THE LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN25
PROPOSAL 6:APPROVAL OF THE APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORREGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
29
28
 
OTHER MATTERS


28
 29
WHITE MOUNTAINS INSURANCE GROUP, LTD. LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN
EXHIBIT AAUDIT COMMITTEE CHARTER

 
Appendix I
Exhibit A

        White Mountains Insurance Group, Ltd. (the "Company" and, together with its subsidiaries, "White Mountains") is a Bermuda-domiciled insurancefinancial services holding company. White Mountains' operations are conducted through its subsidiaries and affiliates in the businesses of property and casualty insurance and reinsurance.

        White Mountains' property and casualty insurance and reinsurance operations principally include: (i) OneBeacon Insurance Group LLC ("OneBeacon", formerly CGU Corporation), a Boston-based property and casualtyan insurance holding company; (ii) White Mountains Re Group, Ltd. ("White Mountains Re"), a holding company and (ii)which combines Folksamerica Holding Company, Inc. ("Folksamerica"), a New York City-based property and casualty reinsurance holding company.company, and The Sirius Insurance Group, a collection of international insurers and reinsurers and (iii) Esurance, Inc. ("Esurance"), a marketer of personal auto insurance directly to customers and through select online agents. White Mountains' invested assets are managed by White Mountains Advisors LLC ("WM Advisors"), a wholly-owned registered investment advisor based in Guilford, Connecticut.advisor.

        The 20032004 Annual General Meeting will be confined to a Member vote on the proposals set forth in this Proxy Statement and on such other matters properly brought before the meeting. As in past years, management will provide Members and all interested parties with a summary of White Mountains' current operations at an informational meeting to be held at 10:00 a.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, May 22, 2003 at the Waldorf Astoria Hotel in New York City. Detailed instructions for participating in the informational meeting will be posted at www.whitemountains.com approximately 30 days in advance of the meeting.

1




WHITE MOUNTAINS INSURANCE GROUP, LTD.
NOTICE OF 20032004 ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING OF MEMBERS
TO BE HELD MAY 19, 2003
OCTOBER 21, 2004

        Notice is hereby given that the 20032004 Annual General Meeting of Members of White Mountains Insurance Group, Ltd. will be held on Monday, May 19, 2003,Thursday, October 21, 2004, at 12:00 noon Atlantic Time at the Fairmont Hamilton Princess Hotel, Hamilton, Bermuda. At this meeting you will be asked to consider and vote upon the following proposals:

        The Company's audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2002,2003, as approved by the Company's Board of Directors, will be presented at this Annual General Meeting.

        Members of record of common shares on the record date, Friday, March 21, 2003,August 27, 2004, (i) who are individuals, may attend and vote at the meeting in person or by proxy or (ii) which are corporations or other entities, may have their duly authorised representative attend and vote at the meeting in person or by proxy. A list of all Members entitled to vote at the meeting will be open for public examination during regular business hours beginning April 1, 2003on or about September 7, 2004 at the Company's registered office located at Clarendon House, 2 Church Street, Hamilton HM 11, Bermuda.

        All Members are invited to attend this meeting.

        Members are invited to complete and sign the accompanying proxy card to be returned to White Mountains Insurance Group, Ltd., c/o EquiServe, Trust Company, N.A. Post OfficeP.O. Box 8643,8694, Edison, New Jersey, 08818-8643,08818-8694, in the envelope provided, whether or not they expect to attend the meeting. Members who hold their common shares in a brokerage account, an employee benefit plan or through a nominee may have the added flexibility of voting their shares by telephone or over the internet.

2




WHITE MOUNTAINS INSURANCE GROUP, LTD.

PROXY STATEMENT

        This Proxy Statement is being furnished in connection with the solicitation of proxies on behalf of the Company's Board of Directors (the "Board") for the 20032004 Annual General Meeting of Members (the "2003"2004 Annual Meeting"), to be held on Monday, May 19, 2003Thursday, October 21, 2004 at the Fairmont Hamilton Princess Hotel, Hamilton, Bermuda. The solicitation of proxies will be made primarily by mail, and the Proxy Statement and related proxy materials will be distributed to registered Members on or about April 7, 2003.August 30, 2004.

        Holders of the Company's common shares ("Members"), par value $1.00 per share ("Common Shares"), as of the close of business on Friday, March 21, 2003,August 27, 2004, the record date, are entitled to vote at the meeting.

        You can ensure that your Common Shares are properly voted at the meeting by completing, signing, dating and returning the enclosed proxy card in the envelope provided. Members who hold their Common Shares in a brokerage account, an employee benefit plan or through a nominee may have the added flexibility of voting by telephone or over the internet. A Member has the right to appoint another person (who need not be a Member) to represent the Member at the meeting by completing an alternative form of proxy which can be obtained from the Corporate Secretary or by notifying the Inspectors of Election (see page 29). Every Member entitled to vote has the right to do so either in person or by one or more persons authorised by a written proxy executed by such Member and filed with the Corporate Secretary. Any proxy duly executed will continue in full force and effect unless revoked by the person executing it in writing or by the filing of a subsequent proxy.

        Sending in a signed proxy will not affect your right to attend the meeting and vote. If a Member attends the meeting and votes in person, his or her proxy is considered revoked.


PROPOSAL 1

ELECTION OF THE COMPANY'S DIRECTORS

        The Board is divided into three classes (each a "Class"). Each Class serves a three-year term.

        At the 20032004 Annual Meeting, Raymond Barrette, Howard L. Clark, Jr., Robert P. CochranMs. Holiday and Arthur ZankelMessrs. Berkowitz, Fass, Steinberg and Smith are nominated to be elected to Class IIII with terms ending in 2006.2007.The Board recommends a vote FOR Proposal 1 which calls for the election of the 20032004 nominees.

3




        The current members of the Board and terms of each Class are set forth below:

Director

 Age
 Director since
Class I—Term Ending in 2004    
 Steven E. Fass 57 2000
 K. Thomas Kemp 62 1994
 Gordon S. Macklin 74 1987
 Joseph S. Steinberg 59 2001

Class II—Term Ending in 2005

 

 

 

 
 John J. ("Jack") Byrne 70 1985
 Mark J. Byrne 41 2001
 George J. Gillespie, III 72 1986
 John D. Gillespie 44 1999
 Frank A. Olson 70 1996

Class III—Term Ending in 2003*

 

 

 

 
 Raymond Barrette 52 2000
 Howard L. Clark, Jr. 59 1986
 Robert P. Cochran 53 1994
 Arthur Zankel 71 1992

*
Nominated
Director

 Age
 Director
since

Class I—Term Ending in 2004    
 Bruce R. Berkowitz 46 2004
 Steven E. Fass 58 2000
 Edith E. Holiday 52 2004
 Joseph S. Steinberg 60 2001

Class II—Term Ending in 2005

 

 

 

 
 John J. ("Jack") Byrne 72 1985
 George J. Gillespie, III 74 1986
 John D. Gillespie 45 1999
 Frank A. Olson 72 1996

Class III—Term Ending in 2006

 

 

 

 
 Raymond Barrette 54 2000
 Howard L. Clark, Jr. 60 1986
 Robert P. Cochran 54 1994
 Lowndes A. Smith 64 2003
 Arthur Zankel 72 1992

        In order to assist the Company in achieving its goal of having a Board with a majority of independent directors, Messrs. Gordon S. Macklin and Allan L. Waters, each current members of Class I, have chosen not to stand for re-election at the 20032004 Annual Meeting.

        Of the nominees for election at the 2004 Annual Meeting, Messrs. Fass and Steinberg were previously elected by shareholders. With respect to a term ending in 2006.

        Patrick M. Byrne, a former Class I director, retired fromthe other nominees, an Executive Officer of the Company initially recommended Mr. Smith for appointment to the Board on February 24, 2003.and non-management directors of the Company initially recommended Mr. Berkowitz and Ms. Holiday for appointment to the Board.

        The following information with respect topresents the principal occupation, business experience, recent business activities involving White Mountains and other affiliations of the nominees and directors has been furnished to the Company by the nominees and directors.

Class I

        Bruce R. Berkowitz has been a director of the Company since May 2004. Mr. Berkowitz serves as Founder and Managing Member of Fairholme Capital Management, L.L.C., a registered investment adviser, and as President and Director of Fairholme Funds, Inc., investment adviser to The Fairholme Fund. Prior to founding Fairholme Capital in 1997, Mr. Berkowitz was a portfolio manager at Smith Barney, Inc. and Lehman Brothers Holdings, Inc. Mr. Berkowitz also serves as Deputy Chairman and director of Olympus Re Holdings, Ltd. ("Olympus") and as a member of the Board of Trustees of First Union Real Estate and Mortgage Investments organization.

Steven E. Fass has been a director of the Company since February 2000. Mr. Fass has served as President and Chief Executive OfficerCEO of White Mountains Re since May 2004. Mr. Fass previously served as President and CEO of Folksamerica and its subsidiaries including Folksamerica Reinsurance Company since 1984. He joined Folksamerica as its Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer in 1980.from 1984 to 2004. Mr. Fass also serves as Chairman of Fund American Reinsurance Company, Ltd. ("Fund American Re"), Chairman of Esurance and is a director of other White Mountains subsidiaries.

K. Thomas Kemp currently serves as an advisor to the Company and has been a director since 1994. Mr. Kemp currently serves as a director and Chief Financial Officer of Montpelier Re Holdings Ltd. ("Montpelier"). Mr. Kemp formerly served as the Company's President from June 2001 to December 2002, as its Deputy Chairman from January 2000 to June 2001 and its President and CEO from 1997 to 2000 and has been with White Mountains since 1991. Mr. Kemp is also a director of Main Street America Holdings, Inc., Amlin plc. and otherseveral White Mountains subsidiaries.

Gordon S. Macklin        Edith E. Holiday has beenwas appointed a director of the Company since 1987 andin August 2004. Ms. Holiday has served as a Deputy Chairman of the CompanyOperating Trustee for TWE Holdings I, II, III Trusts since June 2001. Mr. Macklin2002. Ms. Holiday formerly served as Chairman of White River Corporation, an information services company, from 1993Assistant to 1998, as Chairman of Hambrecht and Quist Group, a venture capital and investment banking company, from 1987 until 1992, and asthe President of the United States and Secretary of the Cabinet from 1990 to 1993 and



as General Counsel to the United States Treasury Department from 1989 to 1990. She is also a director of Amerada Hess Corporation, Canadian National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. from 1970 until 1987. HeRailway Company, H. J. Heinz Company and RTI International Metals and is a director or trustee of Martek Biosciences Corporation, MedImmune Inc., Overstock.com and Spacehab, Inc., and is a trustee, director or managing general partner (as the case may be) of 48 of thevarious investment companies in the Franklin Templeton Group of Mutual Funds.

4



Joseph S. Steinberg has been a director of the Company since June 2001. Mr. Steinberg has served as the President of Leucadia National Corporation ("Leucadia") since 1978.1979. Mr. Steinberg is also a director of Allcity Insurance Company,Leucadia, MK GoldResources Company, Finova Group, Inc. and Jordan Industries, Inc. In addition, Mr. Steinberg is Chairman of Olympus Re Holdings, Ltd., Olympus Reinsurance Ltd. and HomeFed Corporation.

Class II

John J. ("Jack")        Jack Byrne has served as Chairmanbeen a director of the Company since 1985. Mr. Byrne formerly served as Chairman of the Company from 1985 to November 2003, as CEO of the Company from February 2002 to December 2002, as Chairman of the Board of Managers of OneBeacon from June 2001 to December 2001, as CEO of the Company from January 2000 to June 2001, as President and CEO of the Company from 1990 to 1997 and as CEO from 1985 to 1990. Mr. Byrne also serves as Chairmana director of Montpelier and is a director of Overstock.com and other White Mountains subsidiaries. Mark Byrne, Mr. Byrne's son, is also a director of the Company.Symetra Financial Corporation ("Symetra").

Mark        George J. ByrneGillespie, III was appointed a directorChairman of the Company in November 2001. Mr. Byrne manages West End Capital Management Limited. Prior to founding West End, Mr. Byrne held a variety of trading2003 and management positions at Salomon Brothers Inc., Pacific Investment Management Company, Lehman Brothers Inc. ("Lehman") and, most recently, Credit Suisse First Boston. Mr. Byrne's father, Jack Byrne, is Chairman of the Company.

George J. Gillespie, III has been a director of the Company since 1986. Mr. Gillespie has been a Partner in the law firm of Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP ("CS&M") since 1963. He is also a director of The Washington Post Company. CS&M has been retained by White Mountains from time to time to perform legal services. See "Certain Relationships and Related Transactions" and "Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation in Compensation Decisions." Mr. Gillespie's son, John Gillespie, is also a director of the CompanyDeputy Chairman and is Chairman and President of WM Advisors.

John D. Gillespie has servedbeen a director of the Company since 1999 and serves as a Deputy Chairman of the Company since January 2003 and serves as Chairman and President of WM Advisors. Mr. Gillespie served as a Managing Director of OneBeacon from June 2001 to March 2003 and has been a director of the Company since 1999.2003. He is also the founder and Managing Partner of Prospector Partners, LLC ("Prospector"). Prior to forming Prospector, Mr. Gillespie was President of the T. Rowe Price Growth Stock Fund and the New Age Media Fund, Inc. Mr. Gillespie serves as a director of Montpelier Re Holdings Ltd. ("Montpelier"), Symetra and otherseveral White Mountains subsidiaries. White Mountains owns limited partnership investment interests which are managed by Mr. Gillespie. See "Certain Relationships and Related Transactions." Mr. Gillespie's father, George Gillespie, is a directorChairman of the Company.

Frank A. Olson has been a director of the Company since 1996. He serves asMr. Olson is Chairman Emeritus of The Hertz Corporation ("Hertz"). Mr. Olson served as the CEO of Hertz from 1977 to 1999 and has been with that company since 1964. He is also a director of Franklin Templeton Investments Corp., Amerada Hess Corporation and Becton, Dickinson and Company.

Class III

Raymond Barrette was appointed President and CEO of the Company on January 1, 2003 and has been a director since 2000. Mr. Barrette was CEO of OneBeacon from June June��2001 to December 2002 and remains its Chairman. Mr. Barrette joined White Mountains Insurance Group in November 1997 as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. He was President from January 2000 to June 2001. Prior to joining White Mountains Mr. Barrette had 23 years of experience in the insurance business, mostly at Fireman's Fund.Fund Insurance Company. He is also ChairmanLead Director of Folksamerica ReinsuranceMontpelier, and serves asis a director of Montpelier and otherseveral White Mountains subsidiaries and affiliates.subsidiaries.

5



Howard L. Clark, Jr. has been a director or advisor to the Board since 1986. He is currently Vice Chairman of Lehman Brothers, Inc. ("Lehman") and was Chairman and CEO of Shearson Lehman



Brothers Inc. from 1990 to 1993. Prior to joining Shearson Lehman Brothers Inc., Mr. Clark was Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of American Express.Express Company. He is also a director of Lehman Brothers, Maytag Corporation, United Rentals, Inc. and Walter Industries, Inc. Lehman provides various services to White Mountains from time to time. See "Certain Relationships and Related Transactions" and "Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation in Compensation Decisions."

Robert P. Cochran has been a director of the Company since 1994. Mr. Cochran was a founding principal of Financial Security Assurance Holdings Ltd. ("FSA") and has served FSA in various capacities since 1985. He has been President and CEO and a director of FSA since 1990 and became Chairman in 1997. He is also Chairman of Financial Security Assurance Inc. and Financial Security Assurance (U.K.) Ltd.

        Lowndes A. Smith was appointed a director of the Company in November 2003. Mr. Smith formerly served as Vice Chairman of The Hartford Financial Services Group and President and CEO of Hartford Life Insurance Company. He joined The Hartford in 1968. Mr. Smith is also a director of Hartford Mutual Fund and is Chairman of the Connecticut Children's Medical Center.

Arthur Zankel has been a director or advisor to the boardBoard since 1992. Mr. Zankel is currently Senior Managing Member of High Rise Capital Advisors LLC. He served as a General Partner of First Manhattan Co. from 1965 to 1999 and was Co-Managing Partner of First Manhattan from 1979 to 1997. White Mountains owns limited partnership investment interests which are managed by Mr. Zankel is currently Senior Managing Member of High Rise Capital Advisors LLC.Zankel. See "Certain Relationships and Related Transactions" and "Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation in Compensation Decisions." Mr. Zankel


CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

        White Mountains is committed to maintaining sound corporate governance practices. Corporate governance is the system by which companies are directed and controlled and involves the distribution of rights and responsibilities among the Board, management and the Company's Members. The Company has established Corporate Governance Guidelines that spell out its overall approach towards corporate governance.

        The Company also has a directorCode of Citigroup, Inc.Business Conduct that applies to all directors, officers and employees in carrying out their responsibilities to and on behalf of the Company.

        The Company's Corporate Governance Guidelines and Code of Business Conduct are available atwww.whitemountains.com.

The Board

        The day-to-day management of the Company, including the preparation of financial statements and short-term and long-term strategic planning, is the responsibility of the Company's management. The primary responsibility of the Board is to oversee and review management's performance of these functions in order to advance the long-term interests of the Company and its Members.

        In fulfilling this responsibility, directors must exercise common sense business judgment and act in what they reasonably believe to be in the best interests of the Company and its Members. Directors are entitled to rely on the honesty and integrity of senior management and the Company's outside advisors and auditors. However, it is the Board's responsibility to establish that they have a reasonable basis for such reliance by ensuring that they have a strong foundation for trusting the integrity, honesty and undivided loyalty of the senior management team upon whom they are relying and the independence and expertise of the Company's outside advisors and auditors.



Committees of the Board of Directors

Audit Committee

        The Audit Committee comprised of Messrs. Clark, Olson, Steinberg and Zankel,principally performs the following functions: (1) engaging the independent auditor, subject to Board and Member approval, and negotiating the audit fee on behalf of the Board; (2) reviewing with the independent auditor the plan, scope and results of the audit and any recommendations the independent auditor may have for improving or changing the audit and control environment; (3) reviewing and pre-approving any audit, audit-related and non-audit related services the independent auditor performs (including associated fees) and consideringconsiders the effect, if any, this may have on their independence; (4) reviewing with our internal auditors the plan, scope and results of their audits and investigations; (5) discussing with management, the independent auditor and our internal auditors the adequacy of internal accounting controls and discussing with each of them, independently of the other, any recommendations on matters that any of them considers to be of importance; (6) reviewing White Mountains' accounting principles and its financial reporting policies and practices; (7) reviewing prior to publication,the integrity of White Mountains' annual and interim financial statements, earnings releases and other financial information prior to their release to the public; (8) monitoring the Company's compliance with legal and (8)regulatory requirements and other applicable standards; and (9) undertaking other duties as assigned by the Board. Mr. Clark is ChairmanThe Audit Committee currently consists of Messrs. Smith (as Chairman), Berkowitz, Olson and Steinberg.

        The Board has determined that each current member of the Audit Committee.Committee meets applicable NYSE listing standards.

        The Audit Committee Charter, which outlines the duties and responsibilities of the committee, is included herein as Exhibit A and is also available atwww.whitemountains.com.

        Through February 25, 2004, the Audit Committee consisted of Messrs. Clark (as Chairman), Olson, Steinberg and Zankel. The changes to the Audit Committee during 2004 were made in response to the revised New York Stock Exchange ("NYSE") listing standards' definition of independence for audit committee members.

Compensation Committee

        The Compensation Committee comprisedreviews and makes recommendations to the Board on director and officer compensation and oversees the administration of White Mountains' incentive compensation plans. The Compensation Committee currently consists of Messrs. Mark Byrne, Cochran Macklin,(as Chairman), Olson, SteinbergSmith and Zankel, overseesSteinberg.

        The Compensation Committee Charter, which outlines its primary duties and responsibilities, is available atwww.whitemountains.com.

        Prior to forming the Compensation Committee in response to the revised NYSE listing standards, White Mountains' cash-based compensation plans were administered by its former Human Resources Committee and its share-based compensation and benefit policies and programs, including administration of the White Mountains Insurance Group Long-Term Incentive Plan (the "Incentive Plan") and related non-qualified deferred compensation plans. Mr. Cochran is Chairman of theplans were administered by its former Compensation Committee.

Sub-Committee. The Human Resources Committee comprisedconsisted of Messrs. Cochran (as Chairman), Mark J. Byrne (a former director), Clark, Cochran,K. Thomas Kemp (a former director), George Gillespie, Macklin, Olson, Steinberg and Zankel setsand the Compensation Sub-Committee consisted of Messrs. Cochran (as Chairman), Mark Byrne, Macklin, Olson, Steinberg and Zankel.

Nominating and Governance Committee

        The Nominating and Governance Committee was formed in February 2004 and is comprised of Messrs. Clark (as Chairman), Cochran, Olson and Steinberg. The Nominating and Governance Committee performs the following functions: (1) identifies individuals qualified to become directors and



recommends such individuals to the Board for nomination; (2) makes recommendations to the Board concerning committee appointments; (3) develops, recommends and annually reviews corporate governance guidelines and oversees corporate governance matters; (4) coordinates and monitors an annual salaries and bonuses for officers and certain other key employees. Mr. Cochran is Chairmanreview of the Human Resources Committee. intendsBoard's performance; and (5) considers candidates suggested by shareholders.

        The Nominating Committee Charter, which outlines its primary duties and responsibilities, is available atwww.whitemountains.com.

        General Criteria and Process for Selection of Director Candidates.    In identifying and evaluating director candidates, the Nominating and Governance Committee does not set specific criteria for directors. Under its charter, the committee is responsible for determining desired Board skills and attributes such as independence, integrity, expertise, breadth of experience, knowledge about the Company's business or industry and ownership interest in the Company. Directors must be willing to appeardevote adequate time and effort to Board responsibilities. As set forth in person orthe Company's Corporate Governance Guidelines and its charter, the committee is responsible for recommending director candidates to the Board.

        Consideration of Director Candidates Nominated by proxyMembers.    The Company has not adopted a specific policy regarding consideration of director candidates from Members. Members who wish to recommend candidates for consideration by the committee may submit their nominations in writing to the Corporate Secretary at the meetingaddress provided in this Proxy Statement. The committee may consider such Member recommendations when it evaluates and recommends candidates to the Board for submission to Members at each annual general meeting. In addition, Members may nominate director candidates for election without consideration by the person or persons specifiedcommittee by complying with the eligibility, advance notice and other provisions of our Bye-laws as described below.

        Procedures for Nominating Director Candidates.    Shareholder proposals will be eligible for consideration for inclusion in the notice; (c) a descriptionproxy statement and proxy relating to the Company's 2005 Annual Meeting of all arrangements or understandings between the Qualified Member and each such nominee and any other person or persons (naming such person or persons)Shareholders pursuant to whichRule 14a-8 promulgated under the nomination or nominationsSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, if all applicable requirements of Rule 14a-8 are to be madesatisfied and such proposals are received timely by the Qualified Member; (d) such other information regarding each nominee proposed by such Qualified MemberCorporate Secretary as would have been required to be included in a proxy statement filed pursuant to the proxy rules of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") had each such nominee been nominated, or intended to be nominated, by the Board; and (e) the consent of each such nominee to serve as a director of the Company if so elected. The Chairman of the meeting may refuse to acknowledge the nomination of any person not made in compliance with the foregoing procedure.

6


Meetings of the Board of Directors

        During 2002, the following meetings of the Board were held: five meetings of the full Board, nine meetings of the Audit Committee, one meeting of the Compensation Committee and two meetings of the Human Resources Committee. In 2002, each director attended more than 75% of all meetings of the Board including its various committees, except Mr. Steinberg who was unable to attend seven meetings of the Audit Committee, the meeting of the Compensation Committee and one meeting of the Human Resources Committee.


PROCEDURES FOR NOMINATING DIRECTORS
outlined below.

        Under the Company's Bye-laws, nominations for the election of directors may be made by the Board or by any Member entitled to vote for the election of directors (a "Qualified Member"). A Qualified Member may nominate persons for election as directors only if written notice of such Qualified Member's intent to make such nomination is delivered to the Secretary not later than: (i) with respect to an election to be held at an annual general meeting, 90 days prior to the anniversary date of the immediately preceding annual general meeting or not later than 10 days after notice or public disclosure of the date of the annual general meeting is given or made available to Qualified Members, whichever date is earlier, and (ii) with respect to an election to be held at a special general meeting for the election of directors, the close of business on the seventh day following the date on which notice of such meeting is first given to Qualified Members.

Each such notice shall set forth: (a) the name and address of the Qualified Member who intends to make the nomination and of the person or persons to be nominated; (b) a representation that the Qualified Member is a holder of record of Common Shares entitled to vote at such meeting and intends to appear in person or by proxy at the meeting to nominate the person or persons specified in the notice; (c) a description of all arrangements or understandings between the Qualified Member and each such candidate and any other person or persons (naming such person or persons) pursuant to which the nomination or nominations are to be made by the Qualified Member; (d) such other information regarding each candidate proposed by such Qualified Member as would have been required to be included in a proxy statement filed pursuant to the proxy rules of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") had each such candidate been nominated, or intended to be nominated, by the Board; and (e) the consent of each such candidate to serve as a director of the Company if so elected.



Meetings of the Board of Directors

        During 2003, the following meetings of the Board were held: six meetings of the full Board, nine meetings of the Audit Committee, three meetings of the Human Resources Committee and two meetings of the Compensation Sub-Committee. During 2003, each director attended more than 75% of all meetings of the Board including its various committees, except Mr. Steinberg who was unable to attend three meetings of the full Board and Mr. Macklin who was unable to attend one meeting of the Human Resources Committee and one meeting of the Compensation Sub-Committee.



VOTING SECURITIES AND PRINCIPAL HOLDERS THEREOF

Voting Rights of Members

        As of March 21, 2003,August 27, 2004, there were 8,357,08710,769,451 Common Shares and 677,966 Convertible Preference Shares outstanding. The Convertible Preference Shares are not entitled to vote at the 2003 Annual Meeting. Members of record of Common Shares shall be entitled to one vote per Common Share, provided that if and so long as the votes conferred by "Controlled Common Shares" (as defined below) of any person constitute ten percent (10%) or more of the votes conferred by the outstanding Common Shares of the Company, each outstanding Common Share comprised in such Controlled Common Shares shall confer only a fraction of a vote that would otherwise be applicable according to the following formula:

[(T divided by 10)-1] divided by C

        Where: "T" is the aggregate number of votes conferred by all the outstanding Common Shares; and "C" is the number of votes conferred by the Controlled Common Shares of such person.

        "Controlled Common Shares" in reference to any person means:

7


        The limitations set forth above do not apply to any Member which is a "Byrne Entity" (as defined below) for any matter submitted to the vote of Members, except with respect to the election of directors. "Byrne Entity" means any of Mr. Jack Byrne (a director of the Company), any foundation or trust established by Messrs. Jack Byrne, Mark Byrne, Patrick Byrne (a former director), and any associate or affiliate of any of themhim (or any group of which any of themhe is a part), as defined under Section 13(d) of the United States Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

        If, as a result of giving effect to the foregoing provisions or otherwise, the votes conferred by the Controlled Common Shares of any person would otherwise represent 10% or more of the votes conferred by all the outstanding Common Shares, the votes conferred by the Controlled Common Shares of such person shall be reduced in accordance with the foregoing provisions. Such process shall be repeated until the votes conferred by the Controlled Common Shares of each person represent less than 10% of the votes conferred by all Common Shares.



Principal Holders of Common Shares

        To the knowledge of the Company, there was no person or entity beneficially owning more than 5% of the Common Shares outstanding as of March 21, 2003,August 27, 2004, except as shown below. Common Shares are the only class of the Company's securities that are eligible to vote.

Name and address of beneficial owner

 Number of
Common Shares
beneficially owned(a)

 Percent of
Class(b)

  Number of Common Shares beneficially owned
 Percent of Class
 
Berkshire Hathaway Inc. 1440 Kiewit Plaza, Omaha, NE 68131 1,724,200 17.1%
Franklin Mutual Advisers LLC 51 JFK Parkway, Short Hills, NJ 07078(c) 1,254,467 15.0%
Franklin Mutual Advisers LLC 51 JFK Parkway, Short Hills, NJ 07078(a) 1,999,133 18.6%
Berkshire Hathaway Inc. ("Berkshire") 1440 Kiewit Plaza, Omaha, NE 68131 1,724,200 16.0%
Jack Byrne 80 South Main Street, Hanover, NH 03755(d)(b) 1,111,818 13.3% 1,036,277 9.6%

(a)
The Common Shares shown as beneficially owned by Berkshire Hathaway Inc. ("Berkshire") represent Common Shares issuable upon the exercise of warrants to acquire Common Shares. Berkshire cannot vote the Common Shares underlying the warrants until they are exercised. The warrants are currently exercisable.

(b)
Based upon the total Common Shares outstanding at March 21, 2003 for all holders shown above except for Berkshire. For Berkshire, this figure represents Berkshire's percentage of all Common Shares outstanding assuming the exercise of its warrants to acquire 1,724,200 Common Shares.

(c)
The Common Shares beneficially owned by Franklin Mutual Advisers LLC ("Franklin") were acquired for investment purposes on behalf of client investment advisory accounts. Excludes convertible preference shares to acquire 677,966 Common Shares purchased by Franklin on October 24, 2002 which are not voting securities of the Company. See Proposal 4.

(d)(b)
Includes 380,909631,333 Common Shares owned directly by the Jack Byrne 2001 GRAT No. 1 and 277,300 Common Shares owned directly by the Jack Byrne 2003 GRAT No. 1several Grantor Retained Annuity Trusts ("GRATs") which are deemed to be indirectly beneficially owned by Mr. Byrne.Byrne and are voted by the trustee of the GRATs. Also includes 50 Common Shares owned and voted by Mr. Byrne's spouse which he is deemed to indirectly beneficially own. Does not include 25,000 unearned Restricted Common Shares ("Restricted Shares") and 63,13372,715 Common Shares contributed to trusts and charitable foundations for which Mr. Byrne disclaims beneficial ownership, but for which his spouse retains voting power.

8




Beneficial Stock Ownership of Directors and Executive Officers

        The following table sets forth, as of March 21, 2003,August 27, 2004, beneficial ownership of Common Shares by each director of the Company, by certain namedeach Named Executive Officers,Officer, and by all Directors and Executive Officers as a group.


 Number of
Common Shares owned

 Number of Common Shares owned
Directors and Executive Officers

 Beneficially (a)(b)
 Economically (c)
Directors and Executive Officers

Beneficially(a)(b)
 Economically(c)
 28,041 125,721 26,028 117,999
Jack Byrne(d) 1,111,818 1,159,818
Mark J. Byrne(e) 196,031 196,031
Bruce R. Berkowitz(d) 83,500 83,500
Jack Byrne(e) 1,036,277 1,036,277
John P. Cavoores 367 21,007 1,465 17,465
Howard L. Clark, Jr. 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000
Robert P. Cochran 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000
Steven E. Fass 6,411 27,211 7,431 38,417
David T. Foy 0 21,000
George J. Gillespie, III 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000
John D. Gillespie(f) 101,698 148,698 63,703 105,711
K. Thomas Kemp 93,142 107,211
Edith E. Holiday 0 0
Gordon S. Macklin 15,000 17,000 15,000 15,000
Frank A. Olson 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000
Lowndes A. Smith 1,000 1,000
Joseph S. Steinberg(g) 0 0 0 0
Allan L. Waters 3,792 3,792
Arthur Zankel 11,600 11,600 8,600 8,600
All Directors and Executive Officers as a group (19 persons) 1,599,350 1,888,139
All Directors and Executive Officers as a group (20 persons) 1,277,291 1,503,506

(a)
The Common Shares beneficially owned by Messrs JackMr. Byrne Mark Byrne, John Gillespie, Kemp and all Directors and Executive Officers as a group represent 13.3%, 2.3%, 1.2%, 1.1%9.6% and 19.1%11.9% of the total Common Shares outstanding at March 21, 2003,August 27, 2004, respectively. No other Director or Executive Officer beneficially owned 1% or more of the total Common Shares outstanding at that date. Beneficial ownership has been determined in accordance with Rule 13d-3(d)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

(b)
Includes vested and unexercised options ("Options") to acquire 1,3652,265 and 2,7003,600 Common Shares for Messrs. Barrette and Fass, respectively. Excludes 10,000 and 3,000 unearned restricted Common Shares ("Restricted Shares.Shares") held by Messrs. Fass and Foy, respectively.

(c)
Incremental Common Shares shown as economically owned by Directors and Executive Officers representinclude Common Shares beneficially owned, unearned performance share awards at target, unvested Option awards, unearned Restricted Shares and earned phantom shares on compensation deferred.

(d)
Represents Common Shares owned by various investment funds in which Mr. Berkowitz is managing member. Mr. Berkowitz disclaims beneficial ownership of such Common Shares except to the extent of his pecuniary interest in such funds.

(e)
Includes 380,909631,333 Common Shares owned directly by the Jack Byrne 2001 GRAT No. 1 and 277,300 Common Shares owned directly by the Jack Byrne 2003 GRAT No. 1GRATs which are deemed to be indirectly beneficially owned by Mr. Byrne.Byrne and are voted by the trustee of the GRATs. Also includes 50 Common Shares owned and voted by Mr. Byrne's spouse which he is deemed to indirectly beneficially own. Does not include 63,13372,715 Common Shares contributed to trusts and charitable foundations for which Mr. Byrne disclaims beneficial ownership, but for which his spouse retains voting power.

(e)
The Common Shares shown for Mr. Byrne are held in trust for the benefit of others and he thereby disclaims beneficial ownership of such Common Shares.

(f)
Includes 100,00062,000 Common Shares owned by various funds of Prospector in which Mr. Gillespie is either general manager or investment manager. Mr. Gillespie disclaims beneficial ownership of such Common Shares owned by Prospector except to the extent of his pecuniary interest in such funds.

(g)
Does not include any interest in 375,000 Common Shares (approximately 4.5%3.5% of the total Common Shares outstanding at March 21, 2003)on August 27, 2004) beneficially owned by Leucadia. Mr. Steinberg is the President and a Director of Leucadia and, together with certain family members, Mr. Steinberg currently beneficially owns approximately 15.8%13% of the common shares of Leucadia. By virtue of his beneficial ownership of Leucadia, Mr. Steinberg may be deemed to be an indirect beneficial owner of the Common Shares owned by Leucadia.

9




COMPENSATION OF DIRECTORS

Compensation of DirectorsStandard Arrangements

        Messrs. Mark Byrne, Clark, Cochran, George Gillespie, Macklin, Olson, SteinbergDirectors who served during 2003 and Zankelwho are not officers of White Mountains each received a director's retainer of $60,000 as(with Messrs. Smith and Waters receiving a director during 2002partial-year retainer of $30,000) and such directors also received fees of $2,000$4,000 for each Board meeting and committee meeting attended. Messrs. Clark and CochranCommittee Chairmen also received an additional retainers of $5,000 and $10,000 during 2002$25,000 for their roles as Chairman of the Audit Committee and Chairman of the Compensation and Human Resources Committees, respectively.each committee they Chair. Each of the retainers mentioned above relate to the twelve month period from May 20022003 through April 2004. In addition, Messrs. Byrne and George Gillespie also received additional retainers of $50,000 and $25,000 for the 2003 period in which they each served as Chairman of the Board. For 2004, Mr. George Gillespie's retainer as Chairman of the Board was increased to May 2003. Messrs. Barrette, Jack Byrne, Fass, John Gillespie and Kemp did$200,000. Officers of White Mountains do not receive compensation for their role as a director during 2002.director.

Other Arrangements

        During 2002,Mr. Byrne was previously awarded 25,000 Restricted Shares which vested in June 2003. The value of such Restricted Shares earned by Mr. Byrne totalled $10,275,000.

        In May 2003 all outstanding performance shares previously issued to Messrs. Byrne, Macklin and Waters were terminated early in light of proposed independence standards for directors and were paid in cash. The value of the performance shares deemed earned in May 2003 for Messrs. Byrne, Macklin and Waters totalled $10,206,900, $514,800 and $1,188,000, respectively.

        Mr. Byrne received his awards of Restricted Shares and performance shares in connection with his service as an Executive Officer of the Company, Mr. Macklin also received $55,125his award of performance shares in compensation forconnection with his roleservice as a Deputy Chairman of the Company through March 1, 2002 but no longer receives any further compensation for that role.and Mr. Waters received his award of performance shares in connection with his service as an advisor to the Company.


10



COMPENSATION OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

Summary Compensation Table

        The following tables set forth certain information regarding the salary, incentive compensation and benefits paid by White Mountains with respect to 20022003 to its CEO and its four most highly compensated Executive Officers and its former President (collectively, the "Named Executive Officers").






Long-Term Compensation



Annual Compensation
Awards
Payouts

Name and
Principal Position

Year
Salary($)
Bonus ($)
Other
Annual
Compensation
($)

Restricted
Share
Awards
($)(a)

Securities
Underlying
Options (#)

LTIP
Payouts
($)(b)

All Other
Compensation
($)(c)

Jack Byrne
Chairman and
former CEO(d)
2002
2001
2000
$

107,085
398,077
282,692
$

0
0
350,000
0
0
0
$

0
8,650,000
0
0
0
0
$

6,510,000
0
0
$

80,169
43,674
9,100

Steven E. Fass
President and CEO
of Folksamerica


2002
2001
2000



466,000
466,000
466,000



700,000
0
350,000


0
0
0



0
865,000
0


0
0
9,000



1,726,440
244,845
498,500



31,062
26,310
30,780

John D. Gillespie
President of
WM Advisors


2002
2001
2000



400,000
400,000
0



330,000
110,000
0


0
0
0



0
1,384,000
0


0
0
0



0
0
0



66,037
3,219
0

John P. Cavoores
Managing Director
of OneBeacon


2002
2001
2000



400,000
400,000
0



320,000
200,000
0


0
0
0



0
519,000
0


0
0
0



0
0
0



46,292
33,818
0

Raymond Barrette
President and CEO(d)


2002
2001
2000



400,000
398,077
333,654



260,000
0
350,000


0
0
0



0
7,044,500
0


0
0
9,000



6,510,000
3,960,000
0



1,367,840
41,016
15,627

K. Thomas Kemp
former President(d)


2002
2001
2000



300,000
269,615
182,000



150,000
0
75,000


0
0
0




1,896,000
0


0
0
0



1,302,000
5,940,000
0



1,771,656
58,247
129,900
 
  
  
  
  
 Long-Term Compensation
  
 
  
  
  
  
 Awards
  
  
 
 Annual Compensation
 Payouts
  
 
 Restricted
Share
Awards
($)(a)

  
  
Name and
Current Principal Position

 Year
 Salary($)
 Bonus($)
 Other
Annual
Compensation($)

 Securities
Underlying
Options(#)

 LTIP
Payouts
($)(b)

 All Other
Compensation
($)(c)(d)

Raymond Barrette
President and CEO
 2003
2002
2001
 400,000
400,000
400,000
 250,000
260,000
0
 0
0
0
 0
0
7,044,500
 0
0
0
 10,273,313
6,510,000
3,960,000
 56,539
149,090
41,016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
John D. Gillespie
President of WM Advisors
 2003
2002
2001
 400,000
400,000
400,000
 305,000
330,000
110,000
 0
0
0
 0
0
1,384,000
 0
0
0
 10,273,313
0
0
 62,317
66,037
3,219

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
Steven E. Fass(e)
President and CEO of White Mountains Re
 2003
2002
2001
 466,000
466,000
466,000
 700,000
700,000
0
 0
0
0
 0
0
865,000
 0
0
0
 2,222,162
1,726,440
244,845
 16,019
31,062
26,310

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
David T. Foy(f)
Executive Vice President an Chief Financial Officer
 2003 307,692 700,000 0 1,023,000 0 0 0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
John P. Cavoores
President and CEO of OneBeacon
 2003
2002
2001
 400,000
400,000
400,000
 200,000
320,000
200,000
 0
0
0
 0
0
519,000
 0
0
0
 4,109,325
0
0
 70,524
46,292
33,818

(a)
Represents the value of 2001 Restricted Share awards under White Mountains' Long-Term Incentive Plan, as amended, (the "Incentive Plan") as of their respective award dates. Restricted Shares vest approximately two yearsover a fixed term from the date of grant based on continuous service by the employee throughout such period. Holders of Restricted Shares are considered outstanding Common Shares when awarded and are therefore entitled to receive Common Share dividends when declared and such amounts are included in All Other Compensation above.paid. The Company awarded Mr. Foy 3,000 Restricted Shares awarded in February 2001 (which were repurchased for $.01 per shareApril 2003 which are scheduled to vest in December 2002 as described in note (c) below) to Messrs. Byrne, Fass, Gillespie, Cavoores, Barrette and Kemp were 0; 0; 0; 0; 3,750 and 5,000 shares, respectively.April 2006. The market value of Mr. Foy's unvested Restricted Shares awarded in June 2001 (vesting June 2003) to Messrs. Byrne, Fass, Gillespie, Cavoores, Barrette and Kemp were 25,000; 2,500; 4,000; 1,500, 17,000 and 1,000 shares, respectively. The aggregate valuetotalled $1,379,850 as of December 31, 2002 of all unvested2003. The Company awarded Messrs. Barrette, Gillespie, Fass and Cavoores 17,000; 4,000; 2,500 and 1,500 Restricted Shares in June 2001, respectively, which were scheduled to vest in June 2003 and awarded duringMr. Barrette 3,750 Restricted Shares in February 2001 held by Messrs. Byrne, Fass, Gillespie, Cavoores, Barrette and Kemp totalled $8,075,000; $807,500, $1,292,000; $484,500,$5,491,000 and $323,000, respectively.which were scheduled to vest in December 2002 (see note (d) below).

(b)
Represents the dollar value of Performance Shares earned under the Incentive Plan and, in the case offor Mr. Fass, cash awards earned under the Folksamerica Holding Company, Inc. Performance Share Plan and the Folksamerica Holding Company, Inc. Long-term Incentive Plan earned with respect to 2002. The value of earned Performance Shares which were awarded as of January 1, 2000 and declaredPlan.

11


(c)
Amounts include, when applicable, 401(k) Savings Plan employer matching contributions (which did not exceed $11,000$12,000 per individual), director fees and retainers paid by companies in which White Mountains is entitled to board representation and imputed income items relating primarily to corporate-provided housing, personal use of White Mountains' aircraft and the value of life insurance provided in excess of $50,000 of coverage. The amounts for 20022003 relating to such imputed income items for Messrs. Byrne,Barrette, Gillespie, Fass, Gillespie,Foy and Cavoores Barrettewere $12,789; $567; $4,019; $0 and Kemp were $23,169; $20,062; $3,037; $46,292; $90,282 and $4,356,$70,524, respectively. The amounts for 2003, 2002 2001 and 20002001 relating to director fees and retainers of affiliates include $57,000; $0 and $9,100 for Mr. Byrne, $0, $0 and $0 for Mr. Fass, $57,000; $0 and $0 for Mr. Gillespie, $0, $0 and $0 for Mr. Cavoores, $51,500; $0$31,750; $51,500 and $9,685 for Mr. Barrette and $18,300; $45,952$57,750; $57,000 and $119,700$0 for Mr. Kemp. Gillespie.

(d)
During 2002,2003, the Company repurchased from Messrs. Barrette, Gillespie and Kemp 3,750Fass 17,000; 4,000 and 5,0002,500 Restricted Shares, respectively, and in December 2002 repurchased from Mr. Barrette 3,750 Restricted Shares, in each case for $.01 per share and eachshare. Each were granted an amount equivalent to the market value of such Restricted Shares ($1,218,750(2003: $6,987,000 for Mr. Barrette, and $1,625,000$1,644,000 for Mr. Kemp)Gillespie and $1,027,500 for Mr. Fass; 2002: $1,218,750 for Mr. Barrette) in various non-qualified deferred compensation plans of the Company and its subsidiaries. Mr. Kemp's 2002The Company concluded that these transactions created no additional compensation also includes $113,000 paid to him by Montpelier Re Holdings Ltd., an affiliate offor the Company, in connection with his role as its Chief Financial Officer.aforementioned Named Executive Officers.

(d)(e)
Mr. KempFass served as President and CEO of Folksamerica until May 2004. Therefore, Mr. Fass' 2003 compensation was earned entirely at Folksamerica.

(f)
Mr. Foy joined the Company (its Principal Executive Officer at that time) through February 2002.during 2003. Mr. Byrne served as CEO of the Company from February 2002 through December 2002. Mr. Barrette was appointed CEO of the Company as of January 1, 2003.Foy's annual bonus compensation includes a one-time $500,000 sign-on bonus.


Option Grants in Last Fiscal Year

        NoThe Company did not grant any Options were granted during 2002.2003.


Aggregated Option Exercises in Last Fiscal Year and Fiscal Year-End Option Values

        The following table summarizes, for the applicable Named Executive Officers, Options exercised during the Company's latest fiscal year, and the number and in-the-money value of Options outstanding as of the end of the fiscal year.December 31, 2003.

 
  
  
 As of December 31, 2002
 
 Year ended
December 31, 2002

 Number of Securities
Underlying
Unexercised Options at
Fiscal Year-End (#)

  
  
 
 Value of Unexercised
In-the-Money Options at
Fiscal Year-End ($)

Name

 Common Shares Acquired
 Value Realized ($)
 Exercisable
 Unexercisable
 Exercisable
 Unexercisable
Steven E. Fass 0 $0 2,700 6,300 $533,753 $1,245,423
Raymond Barrette 1,000  198,200 1,365 6,300  336,627  1,245,423

12


 
  
  
 As of December 31, 2003
 
 Year ended December 31, 2003
 
 Number of Securities Underlying
Unexercised Options at Fiscal
Year Ended(#)

 Value of Unexercise In-the-
Money Options at
Fiscal Year-End($)

Name

 Common Shares Acquired
 Value Realized($)
 Exercisable
 Unexercisable
 Exercisable
 Unexercisable
Raymond Barrette 0 $0 2,265 5,400 $740,921 $1,766,434
Steven E. Fass 0  0 3,600 5,400  1,177,622  1,766,434


Long-Term Incentive Plans—Awards in Last Fiscal Year

        Performance Shares.    The following table summarizes the performance share awards made to the applicable Named Executive Officers during the latest fiscal year.2003.


  
  
 Estimated Future Payouts (a)
  
  
 Extimated Future Payouts(a)
Name

 Number of
Common Shares (#)

 Performance
period for
payout

 Threshold (#)
 Target (#)
 Maximum (#)
 Number of
Common Shares(#)

 Performance
period for
payout

John J. Byrne 5,000 3 yrs. 0 5,000 10,000
Steven E. Fass(b) 5,000 3 yrs. 0 5,000 10,000
Name

 Number of
Common Shares(#)

 Performance
period for
payout

Threshold(#)
 Target(#)
 Maximum(#)
 0 13,000 26,000
John D. Gillespie 15,000 3 yrs. 0 15,000 30,000 13,000 3 yrs. 0 13,000 26,000
Steven E. Fass 5,000 3 yrs. 0 5,000 10,000
David T. Foy 10,000 3 yrs. 0 10,000 20,000
John P. Cavoores 10,000 3 yrs. 0 10,000 20,000 3,000 3 yrs. 0 3,000 6,000
Raymond Barrette 15,000 3 yrs. 0 15,000 30,000
K. Thomas Kemp 2,000 3 yrs. 0 2,000 4,000

(a)
Performance shares are issued under the Incentive Plan unless otherwise noted and are payable upon completion of pre-defined business goals and are valued based on the market value of Common Shares at the time awards are earned. Performance shares are paid in cash but can be paid in Common Shares if the Board so determines. With respect to the 20022003 performance shares awarded to Messrs. Byrne,Barrette, Foy, Fass and Kemp,Cavoores, "Target" performance is the attainment of a corporate annualized return on equity ("ROE") of 12.0%11% after tax as measured by the Company's growth in its intrinsic business value. At a ROE of 4% or less ("Threshold") the percentage of performance shares payable will be 0% and at a ROE of 21% or more ("Maximum") the percentage of performance shares will become 200% of target. With respect to 50% of the 2002 performance shares awarded to Messrs. Cavoores and Barrette, "Target" performance is the attainment of a 12% ROE, as described above, and 50% is the attainment of an insurance operations trade ratio of 102% (the "Trade Ratio") on OneBeacon's core insurance operations. With respect to 50% of the 20022003 performance shares awarded to Mr. Gillespie, "Target" performance is the attainment of a 12%11% ROE, as described above, and 50% is the attainment of a return on invested assets of 150 basis points over the applicable return on the ten-year United States treasury rate. At a return on invested assets equal to the applicable return on the ten-year United States treasury rate or 6.5%. See "Reports of("Threshold") the Compensation Committees on Executive Compensation-Compensation Committee" for additional information concerning the 2002 awardspercentage of performance shares topayable will be 0% and at a return on invested assets of 325 basis points over the Named Executive Officers which includes a discussionapplicable return on the ten-year United States treasury rate ("Maximum") the percentage of the criteria for "Threshold" and "Maximum" determinations.

(b)
Mr. Fass' award was issued under the Folksamerica Holding Company, Inc./White Mountains Performance Share Plan which is similar to the Incentive Plan in all respects except that performance shares under that plan are payable solely in cash.will become 200% of target.

        Other awards.    During 2002,    Mr. Fass was also granted a contingent cash award under the Folksamerica Holding Company, Inc. Long-Term Incentive Plan.Plan during 2003. The "Target" amount of this award was initially determined as 100% of Mr. Fass' eligible base salary (or $466,000) which is subsequently increased or decreased by Folksamerica's ROEunderwriting return on capital ("UROC") achieved during the performance period. With respect to this award, "Target" performance is the attainment of ana 14% pretax UROC. UROC is a proprietary measure which is viewed by the Company as being indicative of Folksamerica's operating performance.

        Mr. Cavoores was also granted a contingent cash award under the OneBeacon Performance Unit Plan during 2003. The "Target" amount of this award was initially determined as 10,000 Performance Units (which are initially valued at $100 per unit) which is subsequently increased or decreased by OneBeacon's pretax ROE achieved during the performance period. With respect to this award, "Target" performance is the attainment of a combined ratio of 96% (as computed under generally accepted accounting principles or "GAAP"). The GAAP combined ratio is viewed by the Company as measured by Folksamerica's pretax return on standard capital.being indicative of OneBeacon's operating performance.

        See "Reports"Report of the Compensation Committees on Executive Compensation-Compensation Committee"Compensation" for additional information concerning this award which includes a discussion of the criteria for "Threshold" and "Maximum" determinations.these awards.


Equity Compensation Plan Table

        The following table provides information as of December 31, 20022003 with respect to Common Shares that may be issued under White Mountains' existing incentive compensation plans. Performance shares awarded under the Incentive Plan and the Performance Plan are typically paid in cash, though they may be paid in Common Shares at the election of the Compensation Committee.Board or a Committee of the Board. For that reason, these plans are listed in the Equity Compensation Plan Table below. The Folksamerica Holding

13



Company, Inc. Long-Term Incentive Plan, and the Folksamerica Holding Company, Inc./White Mountains Performance Share Plan and the OneBeacon Performance Unit Plan are cash-based plans which do not provide for the issuance of Common Shares and are therefore excluded from this table.

Plan category

 (a)
Number of securities to be issued upon exercise or vesting of outstanding options, warrants and rights

 (b)
Weighted average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights

 (c)
Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a))

Equity compensation plans approved by security holders—Incentive Plan:      234,000
 Performance shares 190,100 $0  
 Restricted Shares 73,500  0  
 Options 61,965  125.31(1) 
  
 
 
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders—Performance Plan(2):       
 Performance shares 301,577 $0 198,423
  
 
 
Plan category

 (a)
Number of securities that may be issued upon exercise or vesting of outstanding options, warrants and rights at Target

 (b)
Weighted average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights

 (c)
Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column(a))

Equity compensation plans approved by security holders — Incentive Plan:      291,000
Performance shares 197,800 $0  
Restricted Shares (1) 6,000  0  
Options (2) 50,565  132.83  
  
 
 
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders — Performance Plan (3):       
 Performance shares 199,874 $0 500,000
  
 
 

(1)
The outstanding Restricted Shares, which were granted in 2003, are currently outstanding but have not been earned. Restricted Shares vest over a fixed term from the date of grant based on continuous service by the employee throughout such period.

(2)
The outstanding Options were granted in February 2000 at an exercise price equal to the underlying market value of Common Shares on the date of grant. The exercise price escalates on a straight-line basis by 6% per annum over the ten-year life of the Options. The weighted average shown above represents the effective exercise price per Option at December 31, 2002.2003.

(2)(3)
The Performance Plan is a long-term incentive plan of OneBeacon which provides for granting of performance shares to certain of its key employees. The performance goals for full payment of performance shares issued under the Performance Plan are similar to those of the Incentive Plan. The Performance Plan was not subject to Member approval. No performance shares were granted under the Performance Plan during 2003.

14




COMPENSATION PLANS

        Pension Plans.    Benefit accruals under a qualified defined benefit pension plan and a non-qualified supplemental plan of OneBeacon were frozen for all participating employees as of December 31, 2002. As of such date, Messrs. Byrne,Barrette, Gillespie Cavoores and BarretteCavoores each had less than 1.6 years of credited service for purposes of accruing pension benefits. As a result, each of their respective accrued retirement benefits were insignificant.

        Benefit accruals under a qualified defined benefit pension plan of Folksamerica were frozen for all participating employees as of December 31, 2002. As of such date, Mr. Fass had 22.6 years of credited service and an average final compensation of $172,000. This resulted in Mr. Fass' annual benefit payable at age 65 being set at $63,160 annually for as long as he lives but in no event for less than 10 years.

        Mr. Fass alsoCavoores participates in the Folksamerica HoldingOneBeacon Insurance Company Inc. Deferred BenefitEmployee Stock Ownership Plan (the "ESOP"), a non-qualified deferred compensationqualified employee stock ownership plan for a select group of employees which was also frozen at December 31, 2002. Folksamerica's credits each participant'sestablished during 2003. Under the terms of the ESOP, Mr. Cavoores' ESOP account annuallyis credited with amounts based onan annual contribution, in cash or Common Shares, in an amount equal to the additional valuelesser of pensionthree percent of his base salary (which was $400,000 for 2003) and 401(k) benefits earned that were above IRS limits on qualified plan benefits.three percent of the applicable Social Security wage base (which was $87,000 for 2003). As of December 31, 2002,2003, Mr. Fass had an account value under the Folksamerica Holding Company, Inc. Deferred Benefit Plan of $1,356,921.

        Employees of the Company areCavoores' ESOP balance was not eligible to receive pension benefits.vested.

        Deferred Compensation Plans.    The Named Executive Officers are eligible to participate in various unfunded, nonqualified plans for the purpose of deferring current compensation for retirement savings (the "Deferred Compensation Plans"). Pursuant to the Deferred Compensation Plans, participants may defer all or a portion of qualifying remuneration payable by the Company, OneBeacon, WM Advisors or Folksamerica which can be invested in various investment options generally available to the investment community including Common Shares. AmountsEarned compensation credited to the deferred compensation accounts of such individuals have been included in the Summary Compensation Table.

        Mr. Fass is a participant in the Folksamerica Holding Company, Inc. Deferred Benefit Plan, a non-qualified deferred compensation plan for a select group of employees which was frozen at December 31, 2002. The Deferred Benefit Plan credited each participant's account annually with amounts based on the additional value of pension and 401(k) benefits earned that were above IRS limits on qualified plan benefits. Mr. Fass's account value under the Deferred Benefit Plan was $1,356,921 as of the date this benefit was frozen.

Other Compensation Arrangements

        Pursuant to the Incentive Plan, under some circumstances Options may become fully exercisable, Restricted Shares may immediately vest and performance shares may become partially or fully payable. Such circumstances are more fully described in the Incentive Plan.

        Pursuant to an employment letter dated February 26, 2003, Mr. Foy received, in addition to the Company's customary officer benefits, a sign-on bonus of $500,000, a guaranteed annual bonus of no less than $200,000 for 2003, 2004 and 2005 and a one-time grant of 3,000 Restricted Shares vesting at the end of Mr. Foy's third year of employment. Under certain circumstances, if Mr. Foy's employment with the Company is terminated within the first three years, Mr. Foy is entitled to one year of accrued salary and bonus compensation and a cash payment equal to a pro rated value of his unearned performance share awards in an amount not less than the value of 3,000 Common Shares.

        Pursuant to an employment agreement dated January 1, 2001, Mr. John Gillespie is entitled to receive an annual base salary of $400,000, an annual bonus of up to 200% of his base salary, minimum grants of performance shares, participation in employee benefit and fringe benefit plans and an indemnity. Under this agreement, Mr. Gillespie may continue his active involvement with Prospector, so long as Mr. Gillespie devotes the requisite time required to fulfill his responsibilities to WM Advisors. The



agreement specifies procedures pursuant to which Prospector's funds have the ability to invest first in opportunities appropriate for both White Mountains and such funds. Either party can terminate the employment agreement upon 30 days notice and, upon termination, Mr. Gillespie is entitled to accrued compensation and a cash payment equal to a pro rated value of his unearned performance share awards.

        In addition, White Mountains has certain revenue sharing agreements with Mr. John Gillespie relating to his interest in Prospector. See "Certain Relationships and Related Transactions" below.

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions

        Mr. Clark is Vice Chairman of Lehman. Lehman which has, for a number of years,from time to time, provided various services to White Mountains including investment banking services, tobrokerage services, underwriting of debt and equity securities and financial consulting services. Lehman was lead underwriter for White Mountains. LehmanMountains' $700.0 million Senior Note offering and was also the arranger, the administrative agent and a lender

15



under the credit facility used to finance the acquisition of OneBeacon which was amended in October 2002.White Mountains' bank facility.

        Mr. George Gillespie is a partnerPartner at CS&M. CS&M which has been retained by White Mountains from time to time to perform legal services.

        Mr. John Gillespie, pursuant to his employment agreement previously described under "Other Compensation Arrangements", may continue his active involvement with Prospector so long as Mr. Gillespie devotes the requisite time required to fulfill his responsibilities to WM Advisors. The agreement specifies procedures pursuant to which Prospector's funds have the ability to invest first in opportunities appropriate for many years, provided legal servicesboth White Mountains and such funds.

        Pursuant to revenue sharing agreements, Mr. Gillespie has agreed to pay White Mountains.Mountains a portion of the revenues and distributions allocable to him in connection with Prospector, in return for White Mountains agreeing to pay the operational expenses of his investment management companies. During 2003, White Mountains' recorded $1,432,409 in net revenue under the Prospector revenue sharing agreements. At December 31, 2003, White Mountains had $99.8 million invested in funds managed by Prospector. In addition, Messrs. Byrne, George Gillespie, John Gillespie and Olson owned investments in funds managed by Prospector as of such date.

        In September 2001, White Mountains entered into a five-year lease at a market-based rate for a building partially owned by Mr. John Gillespie and trusts for the benefit of members of his family (the "Gillespie Trusts"). For 2003, the rental payments attributable to Mr. Gillespie's ownership in the building totalled approximately $15,000 and the rental payments attributable to the Gillespie Trusts' ownership in the building totalled approximately $124,000.

        Mr. John Gillespie indirectly through general and limited partnership interests holds a 44% interest in Dowling & Partners Connecticut Fund III, LP ("Fund III"). OneBeacon Professional Partners, Inc. ("OBPP")OBPP and Folksamerica Specialty Underwriting, Inc. ("FSUI") have borrowed approximately $8 million and $7 million, respectively, from Fund III in connection with an incentive program sponsored by the State of Connecticut known as the Connecticut Insurance Reinvestment Act (the "Act""CIR Act"). The loans mature in April 2007 and bear interest at the option of OBPP and FSUI at either (1) the greater of (a) the prime rate minus 1% and (b) the federal funds rate minus 0.50% or (2) the eurodollar rate plus 0.325%. TheCIR Act provides for Connecticut income tax credits to be granted for qualifying investments made by approved fund managers. The loans made by Fund III to OBPP and FSUI are qualifying investments and, together, have the potential to generate up to $15 million of tax credits that would be shared equally between Fund III on the one hand and OBPP and FSUI on the other. As a result of his interest in Fund III, Mr. Gillespie could realize up to $3.3 million from the tax credits, although any such amount would be subject to the revenue sharing agreements with White Mountains described above.

        Pursuant to revenue sharing agreements, Mr. John Gillespie has agreed to pay White Mountains a portion of the revenues and distributions allocable to him in connection with Prospector, in return for White Mountains agreeing to pay Prospector's operational expenses. During 2002, White Mountains received a net payment of $38,070 from Mr. Gillespie under such revenue sharing agreements. At December 31, 2002, White Mountains had $60.1 million invested in funds managed by Prospector.

        In September 2001, White Mountains entered into a five-year lease at a market-based rate for a building partially owned by Mr. John Gillespie and trusts for the benefit of members of his family (the "Gillespie Trusts"). For 2002, the rental payments attributable to Mr. Gillespie's ownership in the building totalled approximately $13,000 and the rental payments attributable to the Gillespie Trusts' ownership in the building totalled approximately $104,000.

Mr. Zankel is Senior Managing Member of the General Partner of High Rise Capital Advisors LLC, which is the General Partner of High Rise Partners II, L.P. and Cedar Bridge Realty Fund, L.P.



At December 31, 2002,2003, White Mountains had $8.8 million in limited partnership investment interests in High Rise Partners, L.P. and White Mountains owned $36.6a total of $59.1 million in investments that arewere managed by High Rise Capital Advisors LLC.these entities.

        White Mountains provides various reinsurance services to Olympus. During 2003, White Mountains received $67.5 million from Olympus for such services. Mr. Berkowitz, through various investment funds in which he is managing member, is deemed to control more than 10% of Olympus' common shares.

        On June 29, 2004, Berkshire exercised all of its warrants to purchase 1,724,200 Common Shares of White Mountains for $294.0 million. Berkshire bought the warrants in connection with the financing of White Mountains' acquisition of OneBeacon in 2001. The warrants were exercisable at any time until May 2008 and callable by the Company on or after May 31, 2005. Berkshire and the Company agreed to reduce the exercise price by approximately 2% in light of Berkshire's early exercise of the warrants.

        White Mountains and Berkshire led the investor group that acquired Symetra (formerly Safeco Life) for $1.35 billion on August 2, 2004. In addition, in the ordinary course of its business, White Mountains has, and in the future may, enter into insurance and reinsurance transactions with Berkshire on arm's length terms and conditions.

        White Mountains believes that the above transactions were on terms that were reasonable and competitive and, in the case of Lehman, were obtained through a competitive bid process. White Mountains believes that such transactions did not serve to impair the independence of any of the parties involved.


REPORTSREPORT OF THE COMMITTEES ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

        TheWhite Mountains' 2003 compensation matters were addressed by the Company's former Human Resources Committee and its former Compensation Sub-Committee. Going forward, such matters will be addressed by the Company's Compensation Committee (collectively, the "Committees") are comprised entirelywhich was recently formed as a result of non-employee directors.revised NYSE listing standards.

        The Committees are responsible for developing, administering and monitoring the senior executive compensation policies of the Company, OneBeacon, WM Advisors and Folksamerica. Salary and bonus compensation for the Named Executive Officers is established by the Human Resources Committee. Share-based compensation such as performance shares, Options and Restricted Shares is established by the Compensation Committee.

        White Mountains'Company's executive compensation policies are designed with one goal in mind—maximization of Member value over long periods of time. The Committees believeCompany believes that this goal is best

16



pursued by utilising a pay-for-performance program which serves to attract and retain superior executive talent and provide management with performance-based incentives to maximize Member value. Through this compensation program, the Committees seekCompany seeks to maximize Member value by aligning closely the financial interests of White Mountains' management with those of its Members.

        The Committees believeCompany believes that the principal measure of Member value created (or lost) is the Company's ROE as measured by growth in its intrinsic value per share. ThisThe Company calculates intrinsic value per share based on its growth in economic value per share (which is weighted 50%), growth in tangible GAAP book value per share (which is weighted 25%) and growth in market value per share (which is weighted 25%).This proprietary measure is viewed by management and the directors as being aan objective and conservative measure of the intrinsic value of White Mountains and includes the projected cost of all projectedoutstanding compensation awards. The Committees believeCompany believes that, over long periods of time, maximizing the Company'sits ROE will optimize Member returns.

        The Committees believeCompany also believes that the performance-based compensation for key employees should be payable in full only if the Companyit achieves superior returns for its Members. Therefore, the targettargets of many of White Mountains'its performance-based compensation programs are directly linked to achievement of ana stated annualized ROE at least equalROE. With respect to the market yield available from aCompany's 2003 annual bonus program, the target was set at 14% (1000 basis points over the over the applicable return on the ten-year United States Treasury note plus 700treasury). With respect to the Company's 2003 long-term incentive award program, the target was set at 11% (700 basis points.points over the over the applicable return on the ten-year United States treasury). The Committees believeCompany believes that this return isthese returns are a challenging target for the Company in its current form.



        Certain annual and long-term compensation awards at the Company's subsidiaries are not specifically tied to the attainment of a particular ROE. Alternatively, those awards are measured using goals that are pertinent to the subsidiary's overall business objectives which, if met, will allow the Company to achieve its ROE objectives.

        Compensation of White Mountains' management team, including the Named Executive Officers, consists primarily of three components: base salary, annual bonus and long-term incentive awards.

Human Resources Committee (which governed White Mountains' cash-based compensation programs for 2003).

        Base Salary.    Base salary for each Named Executive Officer is established annually, on or about March 1. When establishing the 2003 base salaries of the Named Executive Officers, the Human Resources Committee considersconsidered numerous factors including each Named Executive Officer's qualifications, corporate responsibilities, performance since their last salary adjustment and, except for the CEO, the recommendations of the CEO. The maximum salary is $400,000 except for officers who were grandfathered in their higher salaries when their organization was acquired. Those salaries have been frozen.

        Annual Bonus.    For 2002,2003, the target annual bonus pool for all the Named Executive Officers, except Mr. Fass, was equal to 50% of eligible base salary. Mr. Fass's target annual bonus pool for 20022003 was equal to 75% of his eligible base salary. When establishing the aggregate size of the 2003 annual bonus pool, the Human Resources Committee considersconsidered numerous factors including performance versus the objectives set forth in the Annual Business Plans of the Company, OneBeacon, WM Advisors and Folksamerica, in particular their respective financial performance for the latest fiscal year as measured by ROE or otherwise, and the recommendations of the CEO.

        After establishing the aggregate size of the 2003 annual bonus pool, the Human Resources Committee then considersconsidered the distribution of the bonus pool among the key employees. Each participant's allocation of the pool is determined after considering numerous factors including individual achievements as compared to objectives contained in the Annual Business Plans,annual business plans, the contribution of such achievements to the Company's overall financial performance and the recommendations of the CEO. The CEO receives an annual bonus equal to the average bonus percentage received by all officers eligible to participate in the bonus pool.

        The Human Resources Committee determined that the 2003 financial results of the Company (the basis for Mr. Kemp's bonus)Messrs. Barrette and OneBeacon (the basis for Messrs. Cavoores and Barrette'sFoy's bonus) warranted a bonus pool of 130%125% of target or 65%63% of eligible base salary. The principal factor considered by the Human Resources Committee in making this determination was the Company's 20022003 ROE performance which was determined to be 15.6%21%, as measured by its change in intrinsic value per Common Share during the period, versus a 12% target and OneBeacon's 2002 core trade ratio of 98% versus a target of 102%.14% target.

        The Human Resources Committee determined that the 2003 financial results of WM Advisors (the basis for one-half of Mr. Gillespie's bonus) warranted a bonus pool of 180% of target. The principal factor considered by the Human Resources Committee in making this determination was an 8.3% return on the Company's invested assets which was determined to be in well in excess of broadly accepted benchmarks. The other half of Mr. Gillespie's bonus is dependent upon the financial results of the Company which, as stated above, was determined to warrant a bonus pool of 125%. Based on the average of these two measures, Mr. Gillespie's bonus was determined to be 153% of target or 76% of his eligible base salary.

        The Human Resources Committee determined that the 2003 financial results of Folksamerica (the basis for Mr. Fass' bonus) warranted a bonus pool of 200% of target or 150% of his eligible base salary. The principal factor considered by the Human Resources Committee in making this determination was

17



Folksamerica's 2002 ROE performance2003 pretax UROC which was determined to be 23%26%, as measured by Folksamerica's pretax return on standard capital, versus a target of 14%18%.



        The Human Resources Committee determined that the 2003 financial results of WM AdvisorsOneBeacon (the basis for one-half of Mr. Gillespie'sCavoores' bonus) warranted a bonus pool of 200%98% of target.target of which Mr. Cavoores received 50% of his eligible base salary. The principal factor considered by the Human Resources Committee in making this determination was WM Advisors' 2002 total investment return performance which was determined to be 11.4% which was viewed by the Committee as being an excellent result in lightOneBeacon's 2003 GAAP combined ratio of current market conditions. The other half98%, versus a target of Mr. Gillespie's bonus is dependent upon the financial results of the Company which, as stated above, was determined to warrant a bonus pool of 130% of target. Based on the average of these two measures, Mr. Gillespie's bonus pool was determined to be 165% of target or 82.5% of his eligible base salary.

        Historically, the CEO typically receives an annual bonus equal to the average bonus percentage received by all officers eligible to participate in the bonus pool. For 2002, Mr. Byrne's annual compensation was fixed at $100,000 and as such he did not receive a bonus.97%.

Robert P. Cochran, Chairman
Mark J. Byrne
Howard L. Clark, Jr.
George J. Gillespie, III
Gordon S. Macklin
Frank A. Olson
Joseph S. Steinberg
Arthur Zankel

Compensation CommitteeSub-Committee (which governed White Mountains' share-based compensation programs for 2003)

        Long-Term Incentive Awards.Overview.    The Incentive Plan provides for granting various types of share-based incentive awards including Restricted Shares, Options and performance shares to the Named Executive Officers and certain other key employees of the Company and its subsidiaries.

        Over the past several years, the Company has principally used performance shares in its long-term compensation plans. Performance shares are payable only upon completion of pre-defined business goals and are valued based on the market value of Common Shares at the time awards are earned. Performance shares awarded under the Incentive Plan are paid in cash but can be paid in Common Shares if the Board so determines.

        The Compensation CommitteeCompany believes that awards of performance shares are an attractive method of providing incentives for management to strive to maximize Member value over the long term.term which aligns the interests of management with those of the Company's Members. This belief is predicated on the following factors: (i) such awards are earned over multi-year periods; (ii) such awards are generally made in the form ofderive their value from Common Shares, which helps to align the interests of management with those of the Company's Members;Shares; and (iii) performance sharessuch awards are contingent upon the achievement of a specified ROE, or such other measures as may be selected in advance by the Compensation Committee, over the applicable performance period which further aligns the interests of managementperiod.

        Long-term incentive awards granted during 2003.    During 2003, Messrs. Barrette, Gillespie, Fass, Foy and the Company's Members.

        In 2002, Messrs. Byrne, Fass, Gillespie, Cavoores Barrette and Kemp were granted 13,000; 13,000; 5,000; 5,000; 15,000; 10,000; 15,000 and 2,0003,000 performance shares, respectively, by the Compensation Committee.Sub-Committee. The performance period for such awards began on January 1, 20022003 and will continue through December 31, 2004.2005.

        With respect to the 20022003 performance shares awarded to Messrs. Byrne,Barrette, Fass, Foy and Kemp,Cavoores, "Target" performance is the attainment of a ROE of 12% after tax which would result in such performance shares being fully earned ("Target")11%. At a ROE of 5%4% or less no such("Threshold") the percentage of performance shares wouldpayable will be

18



earned ("Threshold") 0% and at a ROE atof 21% or above 23%,more ("Maximum") the percentage of performance shares will become 200% of such performance shares would be earned ("Maximum").

target. With respect to 50% of the 2002 performance shares awarded to Messrs. Cavoores and Barrette, performance is the attainment of a 12% after tax ROE as previously described. With respect to the remaining 50% of the 2002 performance shares awarded to Messrs. Cavoores and Barrette, "Target" performance is the attainment of a Trade Ratio of 102% on OneBeacon's core insurance operations. At a Trade Ratio of 106% or more, no such performance shares would be earned ("Threshold") and at a Trade Ratio of 96% or less, 200% of such performance shares would be earned ("Maximum").

        With respect to 50% of the 20022003 performance shares awarded to Mr. Gillespie, "Target" performance is the attainment of a 12% after taxan 11% ROE, as previously described. With respect to the remainingdescribed above, and 50% of the 2002 performance shares awarded to Mr. Gillespie, "Target" performance is the attainment of a return on invested assets of 150 basis points over the applicable return on the ten-year United States treasury rate or 6.5%.rate. At a return on invested assets of 5%equal to or less no suchthan the applicable return on the ten-year United States treasury rate ("Threshold"), the percentage of performance shares wouldpayable will be earned ("Threshold")0% and at a return on invested assets of 8%325 basis points or more over the applicable return on the ten-year United States treasury rate ("Maximum"), the percentage of performance shares will become 200% of such performance shares would be earned ("Maximum").target.

        In 2002,        Mr. Fass was also granted a contingent cash award under the Folksamerica Holding Company, Inc. Long-Term Incentive Plan.Plan during 2003. The "Target" amount of this award was initially determined as 100% of Mr. Fass' eligible base salary (or $466,000) which is subsequently increased or decreased by Folksamerica's ROEUROC achieved during the performance period. With respect to this to award, "Target"



performance is the attainment of ana 14% ROE,pretax UROC, as measured by Folksamerica's pretax return on standard capital. At

        Mr. Cavoores was also granted a contingent cash award under the OneBeacon Performance Unit Plan during 2003. The "Target" amount of this award was initially determined as 10,000 Performance Units initially valued at $100 per unit (or $1,000,000) which is subsequently increased or decreased by OneBeacon's pretax ROE achieved during the performance period. With respect to this award, "Target" performance is the attainment of a combined ratio of 96%.

        Mr. Foy received a one-time grant of 3,000 Restricted Shares as an incentive to join the Company in April 2003. Mr. Foy's Restricted Shares are scheduled to vest in April 2006.

        No Options were granted during 2003.

        Long-term incentive awards earned during 2003.    Messrs. Barrette, Gillespie, Fass and Cavoores had, pursuant to a 2001 grant, 15,000, 15,000, 2,000 and 6,000 performance shares at Target, respectively, eligible for payout for the three-year performance share cycle ended December 31, 2003. Mr. Foy joined the Company during 2003 and was not awarded performance shares for the 2001 to 2003 performance share cycle.

        With respect to 50% of the 2001 performance shares awarded to Messrs. Barrette, Gillespie and Cavoores and 100% of the 2001 performance shares awarded to Mr. Fass, "Target" performance was predetermined to be the attainment of a Company ROE of 12.1% (at a ROE of 7%5.1% or less, the awardno such performance shares would not be earned ("Threshold") and at a ROE at or above 21%23%, 200% of the award would be earned ("Maximum").

        Messrs. Byrne, Fass, Gillespie, Cavoores, Barrette and Kemp had, pursuant to a 2000 grant, 10,000, 2,000, 0, 0, 10,000 and 2,000 performance shares eligible for payout, respectively, subject to the attainment of a 13% target ROE. At an ROE of 25% or greater, 200% of such performance shares would be earned. Duringearned).

        With respect to the 2000remaining 50% of the 2001 performance shares awarded to 2002Messrs. Barrette and Cavoores, "Target" performance period,was predetermined to be the Company attainedattainment of an ROEinsurance operations trade ratio of 27.8% calculated in accordance with105% (the "Trade Ratio") on OneBeacon's core insurance operations (at a Trade Ratio of 107% or more, no such performance shares would be earned and at a Trade Ratio of 101% or less, 200% of such performance shares would be earned).

        With respect to the Incentive Plan.remaining 50% of the 2001 performance shares awarded to Mr. Gillespie, "Target" performance was predetermined to be the attainment of a return on invested assets of 100 basis points over the applicable return on the two-year United States treasury bill (at an investment return equal to or less than the two-year treasury, no such performance shares would be earned and at an investment return equal to or greater than 200 basis points over the two-year treasury, 200% of such performance shares would be earned).

        In light of the excellent ROEresults attained during the performance period, the Compensation CommitteeSub-Committee determined that 200% of suchthe 2003 performance shares were fully earned in the following percentages: (i) those contingent on the Company's ROE were earned 93% based on an attained ROE of 11.6% versus a target of 12.1%, (ii) those contingent on OneBeacon's Trade Ratio were earned 200% based on an attained Trade Ratio of 98% versus a target of 105% and those contingent on WM Advisor's return on invested assets were earned 200% based on attained return on invested assets of 9.9% versus a target of 6.5%. As a result, Messrs. Barrette, Gillespie, Fass and Cavoores earned a total of 21,975, 21,975, 1,860 and 8,790 performance shares on February 24, 2003.25, 2004, respectively. The dollar value of such performance shares earned are included in the Summary Compensation Table.

        Mr. Fass also had, pursuant to a 20002001 grant, a contingent cash award under the Folksamerica Holding Company, Inc. Long-Term Incentive Plan. The "Target" amount of this award was initially determined as 100% of Mr. Fass' eligible base salary which iswas to be subsequently increased or decreased by Folksamerica's ROEUROC achieved during the performance period. With respect to this to award, "Target" performance iswas predetermined to be the attainment of a 14.7% ROE, as measured by Folksamerica's14% pretax return on standard capital.UROC. At a ROEUROC of 7.35%7% or less, the award would not be earned.earned and at a UROC of 21%, the award would be earned 200%. During the 2000-2002 2001-2003



performance cycle, Folksamerica attained an ROEa pretax UROC of 12.1%19%, as calculated in accordance with the Folksamerica Long-Term Incentive Plan, and as such the Compensation CommitteeSub-Committee determined that 65%176% of Mr. Fass' award, or $424,440,$1,352,612, was earned on February 24, 2003.25, 2004. This amount is included in the Summary Compensation Table.

        During 2002,2003, the Company repurchased 17,000, 4,000 and 2,500 Restricted Shares from Messrs. Barrette, Gillespie and Kemp 3,750 and 5,000 Restricted Shares,Fass, respectively, for $.01 per share and each were granted an amount equivalent to the market value of such Restricted Shares in various non-qualified deferred compensation plans of the

19



Company and its subsidiaries. The dollar value of the deferred compensation grant to Messrs. Barrette and Kemp is included in the Summary Compensation Table.Also during 2003, Mr. Cavoores' 1,500 Restricted Shares vested fully.

Robert P. Cochran, Chairman
Mark J. Byrne
Gordon S. Macklin
Frank A. Olson
Joseph S. Steinberg
Arthur Zankel



REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE

        The primary purpose of the Audit Committee is to monitor the integrity of the Company's financial reporting process. The Board annually reviews the NYSE listing standards' definition of independence for audit committee members and has determined that each member of the Committee currently meets that standard.

        Management is responsible for the preparation, presentation and integrity of the Company's consolidated financial statements. The independent registered public accounting firm is responsible for performing an independent audit of the Company's consolidated financial statements and expressing an opinion on the conformity of those financial statements with GAAP.

        In connection with the audit of the Company's financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2002,2003, the Audit Committee has: (1) reviewed and discussed the audited financial statements with management; (2) reviewed and discussed the disclosures contained within the Annual Report on Form 10-K; (3) reviewed and discussed with the Independent Auditorindependent registered public accounting firm the matters required by Statement of Auditing Standards No. 61; and (4) reviewed and discussed with the Independent Auditorindependent registered public accounting firm the matters required by Independence Standards Board Statement No. 1.

        Based on these reviews and discussions, the Audit Committee has determined that the non-audit fees billed by the Independent Auditorindependent registered public accounting firm for services performed in 2003 and 2002 (as shown below) are compatible with maintaining their independence. Further, the Audit Committee has recommended to the Board that the audited financial statements be included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for filing with the SEC and for presentation to the Members at the 20032004 Annual Meeting.

        The Audit Committee has established a Charter which outlines its primary duties and responsibilities. The Audit Committee Charter, which has been approved by the Board, is reviewed at least annually and is updated as necessary. The Audit Committee Charter was furnished to the Company's Members in its 2001 Proxy Statement.is included herein as Exhibit A and is also available atwww.whitemountains.com.

        February 25, 2004

Howard L. Clark, Jr., Chairman
Frank A. Olson
Joseph S. Steinberg
Arthur Zankel



INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANT FEES BILLED BY THE COMPANY'S
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR FORAND SERVICES PERFORMED IN 2002

        The Audit Fees    AggregateCommittee, pursuant to its policy, pre-approves the scope and fees billed for all services performed by the 2002independent registered public accounting firm. Annually, the Audit Committee receives and pre-approves a written report from its independent registered public accounting firm describing the elements expected to be performed in the course of its audit of the Company's consolidatedfinancials. All other audit, audit-related and non audit-related services rendered by the independent registered public accounting firm also require pre-approval, which may be granted in accordance with the provisions of the policy either (a) at a meeting of the full Audit Committee, (b) on an interim basis by the Chairman of the Audit Committee, provided that the requested services are not expressly prohibited and are communicated to the Audit Committee at its next regularly scheduled meeting, or (c) on a per-project basis through specific compliance with pre-approved definitions of services that do not exceed per-project limits established by the Committee, provided that the Company's General Auditor makes a full report of all services pre-approved by the policy at the next regularly scheduled meeting of the Committee.

        It is the intent of the policy to assure that the independent registered public accounting firm's performance of audit, audit-related and non audit-related services are consistent with all applicable rules on auditor independence. As such, services expressly prohibited by the Audit Committee under its policy include bookkeeping or other services related to the accounting records or financial statements including quarterly reviews totalled $1,952,300.of the Company or its subsidiaries; financial information systems design and implementation; appraisal and valuation services, fairness opinions; contribution-in-kind reports; actuarial services; internal audit outsourcing services; management functions; human resources; broker-dealer, investment advisor or investment banking services; legal services; and expert services unrelated to the audit.

        Financial Information Systems Design and Implementation Fees    No such services were performed during 2002.

        All Other Fees    Aggregate fees billed for all other services performed by the Company's independent registered public accounting firm during 2003 were pre-approved by the Audit Committee pursuant to the policy described above.

        The services performed by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP in 2003 and 2002 totaled $4,565,700. These fees related primarily to: i) tax complianceare described below. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP does not provide any services to the Company prohibited under applicable laws and regulations, such as financial information systems design and implementation. From time to time, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP may perform permissible consulting services for existing companiesthe Company, provided they have been pre-approved in accordance with the policy described above. To the extent consulting services are provided by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, they are closely monitored and consultingcontrolled by both management and the Audit Committee to ensure that their nature and extent do not interfere with the independence of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP. The independence of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP also is considered annually by the Audit Committee.

        The following table sets forth the approximate aggregate fees billed by the Company's independent registered public accounting firm for professional services provided in 2003 and 2002:

 
 2003
 2002
Audit Fees(1) $2,629,400 $2,739,200
Audit-Related Fees(2)  1,711,900  915,000
Tax Fees(3)  1,067,100  635,200
All Other Fees(4)    2,390,100

(1)
The fees in this category were for professional services rendered in connection with (i) the audit of the Company's annual financial statements set forth in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K, (ii) the review of the Company's quarterly financial statements set forth in the Company s Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, (iii) audits of the Company's subsidiaries that are required by statute or regulation, and (iv) services that generally only the Company's independent registered public accounting firm reasonably can provide, such as comfort letters, consents and agreed upon procedures reports.

(2)
The fees in this category were for professional services rendered in connection with (i) consultations concerning financial accounting and reporting standards of transactions or events, (ii) internal control reviews, (iii) employee benefit plan audits and (iv) due diligence services.

(3)
The fees in this category were for professional services rendered in connection with tax strategy assistance and tax structuring services related to acquisition activities, ii) audit services related to capital raising activities and statutory reporting requirements and iii)compliance services.

(4)
The fees in this category were for non-financial information systems technology consulting. Of these fees, $1,658,400 related to services provided by PwCPricewaterhouseCoopers Consulting prior to the sale of this division to IBM on October 1, 2002. The services provided by PwCPricewaterhouseCoopers Consulting related to various non-financial information systems technology consulting projects.

20



MEMBER RETURN GRAPH

        The following graph shows the five-year cumulative total return for a Member who invested $100 in Common Shares (NYSE symbol "WTM") as of January 1, 1998,1999, assuming re-investment of dividends. Cumulative returns for the five-year period ended December 31, 20022003 are also shown for the Standard & Poor's 500 Stocks (Property & Casualty) Capitalization Weighted Index ("S&P P&C") and the Standard & Poor's 500 Stocks Capitalization Weighted Index ("S&P 500") for comparison.

        As stated herein, White Mountains' various compensation plans are based on its growth in its intrinsic value which is believed to be a conservative proxy for its intrinsic business value. The Company's long-term goal is to maximize its intrinsic business value per Common Share which will, in turn, affect its market value per Common Share.


Five-Year Cumulative Total Return

(value of $100 invested January 1, 1999)

GRAPHICCHART

21




COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND
INSIDER PARTICIPATION
IN COMPENSATION DECISIONS

        The Company notes certain relationships and transactions pertaining to Messrs. Clark, George Gillespie and Zankel who arewere Members of either the Compensationformer Human Resources Committee and/or the Human Resources Committee.former Compensation Sub-Committee through February 25, 2004. See "Certain Relationships and Related Transactions."


COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 16(a) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT

        Pursuant to SEC rules relating to the reporting of changes in beneficial ownership of Common Shares, the Executive Officers, Directors and greater than 10% Members are believed to have filed all reports required under Section 16 on a timely basis during 2002.2003 except for Mr. Barrette, however, filed an amendedCavoores who was late in filing a Form 5 on March 27, 20034 relating to December 2000 reporting a gifthis purchase of 385100 Common Shares in December 2000.on June 5, 2003.


PROPOSAL 2

ELECTION OF DIRECTORS OF FUND AMERICAN RESIRIUS INTERNATIONAL INSURANCE CORPORATION ("SIRIUS INTERNATIONAL")

        Bye-law 77 of the Company provides that the boardsboard of directors of any wholly-owned operating subsidiary of the Company incorporated under the laws of Bermuda such as Fund American Re, or any other company designated by the Board, such as Sirius International, be elected by the Company's Members.

        Proposal 2 calls for the election of Messrs. Barrette,Lars Ek (Executive Vice President and Group Chief Financial Officer of Sirius International), Fass, Anders Henriksson (PresidentGert Lindberg (by appointment of Fund American Re)the Swedish Supervisory Authority) and Ms. Sheila E. NicollGoran Thorstensson (President and Chief Executive OfficerCEO of Olympus Re Holdings, Ltd., a reinsurance company organised under the laws of Bermuda)Sirius International) to the board of directors of Fund American Re. The proposal also calls for the election of Ms. Elinor M. Lucas (an associate of Conyers, Dill & Pearman, the Company's Bermuda counsel) as an alternate to any one or more of the directors of Fund American Re.Sirius International.

        Messrs. Barrette,Ek, Fass and Henriksson and Ms. LucasThorstensson will not receive any compensation for their services as a director of Fund American Re. Ms. NicollSirius International. Mr. Lindberg is expected to receive an annual director retainer of $5,000. BiographicalSEK 60,000 (approximately $8,000 as of the date of this report). Additional biographical information relating to Messrs. Barrette andMr. Fass is presented under Proposal 1 "Election of the Company's Directors."

        The Board recommends a vote FOR Proposal 2 which calls for the election of the director nominees of Sirius International.


PROPOSAL 3

ELECTION OF DIRECTORS OF FUND AMERICAN REINSURANCE COMPANY, LTD. ("FUND AMERICAN RE") AND SCANDINAVIAN REINSURANCE COMPANY LTD. ("SCANDINAVIAN RE")

        Bye-law 77 of the Company provides that the board of directors of any wholly-owned operating subsidiary of the Company incorporated under the laws of Bermuda, such as Fund American Re and Scandinavian Re, or any other company designated by the Board, be elected by the Company's Members.

        Proposal 3 calls for the election of Messrs. Fass, Anders Henriksson (President of Fund American Re), Mark Kaplen (President and CEO of Scandinavian Re), Michael E. Maloney (Managing Director of White Mountains Re), Goran Thorstensson (President and CEO of Sirius International) and Michael E. Tyburski (Managing Director of White Mountains Re) to the boards of directors of Fund American Re and Scandinavian Re.

        Messrs. Fass, Henriksson, Kaplen, Maloney, Thorstensson and Tyburski will not receive any compensation for their services as a director of Fund American Re and Scandinavian Re. Additional biographical information relating to Mr. Fass is presented under Proposal 1 "Election of the Company's Directors."

The Board recommends a vote FOR Proposal 3 which calls for the election of the director nominees of Fund American Re and Scandinavian Re.



PROPOSAL 34

ELECTION OF DIRECTORS TO ANY NEW NON-UNITED STATES OPERATING SUBSIDIARIES

        Bye-law 77 of the Company provides that the boards of directors of any wholly-owned operating subsidiary of the Company which is incorporated under the laws of Bermuda, or any other company designated by the Board, be elected by the Company's Members.

        Proposal 34 calls for the election of Messrs. Barrette and Fass to the board of directors of any wholly-owned, non-U.S. operating subsidiary that may be formed by the Company in the future. Messrs. Barrette and Fass will not receive any compensation for their services as a director of any newly-formed, non-U.S.such company. Biographical information relating to Messrs. Barrette and Fass is presented under Proposal 1 "Election of the Company's Directors."

        The Board recommends a vote FOR Proposal 34 which calls for the election of Messrs. Barrette and Fass to the board of directors of any new non-United States operating subsidiaries.

22




PROPOSAL 4

ISSUANCE OF COMMON SHARES UPON CONVERSION OF CONVERTIBLE PREFERENCE SHARES

Background

        On October 24, 2002, White Mountains sold $200 million in convertible preference shares (the "Convertible Preference Shares") in a private transaction to Franklin, an existing Member (see page 8). The Convertible Preference Shares are to be repurchased and cancelled by the Company in consideration of 677,966 Common Shares upon approval of this proposal.

        White Mountains used the proceeds from the sale of Convertible Preference Shares to partially repay, on November 29, 2002, a $260 million Seller Note (the "Seller Note") that was issued in connection with White Mountains' 2001 acquisition of OneBeacon. Under Bermuda law and the Company's Bye-laws, the issuance of the Convertible Preference Shares to repay the Seller Note did not require Member approval.

        In contemplation of the repayment of the Seller Note, it was White Mountains' desire to issue, and Franklin's preference to receive Common Shares as part of the financing activities. However, the New York Stock Exchange, Inc. (the "Exchange"), which lists the Common Shares, requires Member approval for the issuance of listed shares in a private transaction under the circumstances of such issuance.

        In evaluating the issuance of the Convertible Preference Shares, the Board determined that it was in your interest, as Members of the Company, to repay the Seller Note in full with cash, as opposed to Common Shares valued at $245.00 per share pursuant to the terms of the Note Purchase Option Agreement which governed the Seller Note. Under a capital structure devised by the Company, the Convertible Preference Shares, convertible into 677,966 Common Shares upon Member approval, were issued to Franklin in lieu of Common Shares. The Board would not have authorized the issuance of the Convertible Preference Shares if it had not believed the issuance of such securities in such circumstances was in the interest of the Company and its Members.

        The Company agreed to seek Member approval for the issuance of Common Shares upon the repurchase and cancellation of the Convertible Preference Shares at the 2003 Annual Meeting. Approval by a majority of the votes cast on this proposal will be required to approve the issuance,provided that a quorum is present, in person or by proxy, at the 2003 Annual Meeting. The principal terms of the Convertible Preference Shares appear at the end of this proposal.

        The Seller Note was repaid in full on November 29, 2002 and, accordingly, this proposal will have no effect on that transaction.

Consequences of the Vote

        Upon approval of this proposal, each Convertible Preference Share will be repurchased and cancelled by the Company in consideration of the issuance of one Common Share (the "Conversion"). Assuming Conversion, the number of outstanding Common Shares at March 21, 2003 would increase by approximately 8.1%.

        If the required affirmative vote by the members is not obtained, the Convertible Preference Shares will remain outstanding in accordance with their respective current terms. Those terms, as described below, provide that if the Members of the Company have not voted to approve the Conversion by March 31, 2005, Franklin will have the right to receive cash, at the then market value of Common Shares, in lieu of Common Shares upon any Conversion.

23



Reasons for the Board's Recommendation

        The Board believes that the Conversion benefits existing members for the following reasons: (i) Conversion eliminates the liquidation preference holders of Convertible Preference Shares have over holders of Common Shares; (ii) Conversion eliminates the dividend requirement of $2.95 annually per Convertible Preference Share; (iii) disapproval of the Conversion does not benefit holders of Common Shares as the Convertible Preference Shares derive the same economic benefit from any increase in the value of the Company's Common Shares; and (iv) although the Convertible Preference Shares do not enjoy general voting rights, the Board believes that this voting disadvantage is balanced by the special voting rights described below. The Board does recognize that the Convertible Preference Shares are not listed on the Exchange and have no established market. As such they may be less liquid than Common Shares; however, this possible difference is not likely to produce a benefit for holders of Common Shares since they can be redeemed for cash after March 31, 2005 in their current form.

        As described above, absent Member approval, the Company may be required to pay cash for any Convertible Preference Shares Converted after March 31, 2005 at the then market value of the Company's Common Shares, or upon the redemption of the Convertible Preference Shares on October 31, 2012 at $295.00 per share. Conversions or redemptions for cash could create a strain on the Company's cash resources which could, in turn, hinder the payment of cash dividends to holders of Common Shares. Further, if the Company were to borrow additional monies for such redemptions, the Company's debt to equity ratio could increase to a level higher than the Company prefers to operate. Finally, any cash used to convert or redeem the Convertible Preference Shares would not be available for other corporate purposes.

Convertible Preference Shares

        The following summarizes the principal features of the Convertible Preference Shares:

        Dividends.    Holders of Convertible Preference Shares, when and as declared by the Board out of the net profits or net assets of the Company legally available for payment under Bermuda Law, are entitled to receive cumulative dividends payable in cash at the annual rate of $2.95 per share, payable semi-annually beginning on December 31, 2002. Past due and unpaid dividends will accrue an additional dividend at an annual rate of 1% compounded each year. The Company will not declare or pay dividends on its Common Shares as long as dividends on the Convertible Preference Shares are past due and unpaid.

        Conversion.    Upon receipt of Member approval, Conversion will occur at a conversion price of $295.00 per share, subject to certain standard anti-dilution adjustments for issuances of and distributions on Common Shares. The conversion price represents a $30 discount to the closing market price for the Common Shares on October 23, 2002, the day Franklin committed to purchase such shares. After March 31, 2005, and absent Member approval, each Convertible Preference Share is convertible into cash equal to the then fair market value of each Common Share.

        Redemption.    Any Convertible Preference Shares outstanding on October 31, 2012 will be redeemed by the Company for $295.00 in cash per share, plus all accrued dividends as of such date.

        Voting.    The holders of the Convertible Preference Shares have no voting rights except for any voting rights provided in the Company's Bye-laws or required by the Companies Act 1981. In addition, the Company shall not amend, alter or repeal its Memorandum of Continuance, Bye-laws or the terms and conditions of the Convertible Preference Shares in a manner that adversely affects the rights of the Convertible Preference Shares or increases the authorized number of Convertible Preference Shares without first obtaining the consent or approval of at least two-thirds of the then-outstanding Convertible Preference Shares.

24



        Liquidation.    In the event of any liquidation, dissolution, or winding up of the Company, holders of the Convertible Preference Shares are entitled to receive payment of $50.00 per share plus all accrued dividends before any distribution is made to holders of Common Shares.

        Restrictions on Transfer.    Convertible Preference Shares can only be transferred, except to the extent required by applicable law, (i) with the prior written consent of the Company, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld, (ii) by any initial holder to one of its affiliates or (iii) to the Company or any initial holder of Convertible Preference Shares. The Convertible Preference Shares have not been registered under the Securities Act of 1933 and may not be offered or sold in the United States or to any citizen or resident of the United States in absence of a valid registration of the Securities Act of 1933 except in reliance on an exemption from the registration requirements. Additionally, transfers of Convertible Preference Shares may also be subject to approval of the Bermuda Monetary Authority.

        Registration Rights.    Subject to certain limitations, holders of the Convertible Preference Shares are entitled to demand registration rights and piggyback rights for the registration of the Common Shares issued upon Conversion.

The Board recommends a vote FOR Proposal 4 approving the issuance of additional Common Shares upon conversion of Convertible Preference Shares.


PROPOSAL 5

TECHNICAL AMENDMENTS TO THE LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN

        Members are being asked to approve certain technical amendments to the Company's Long-Term Incentive Plan at the 2003 Annual Meeting. The proposed amendments do not increase the number of Common Shares that may be issued under the Incentive Plan in the future. The Incentive Plan was adopted by the Board and approved by the Company's sole shareholder in 1985 and subsequently amended by its shareholders in 1995 and by its Members in 2001. On February 24, 2003, the Compensation Committee approved, subject to the approval of the Company's Members, a series of technical amendments to the Incentive Plan to: (i) create a currency, known as performance units, that is able to track the growth in value of a particular business unit, such as a subsidiary of the Company, (ii) to impose an annual limit on the number of performance shares that can be granted in a given year to any one individual and (iii) to include the Company's measure of intrinsic value per share as an additional performance objective.

Background

        The Company believes that long-term compensation should be based on "pay for performance" and further believes that management should act as if they were owners. With these objectives in mind, the Committee believes that the proposed amendments to the Incentive Plan will allow the Company to continue to closely align the financial interests of management with those of the Company's Members. This summary of the material terms of the Incentive Plan is qualified in its entirety by reference to Appendix I attached to this Proxy Statement.

Description of the Incentive Plan

        Awards.    As amended, the Incentive Plan provides for the grant of performance shares, performance units, options, stock appreciation rights and shares of restricted stock.

        Administration.    The Compensation Committee of the Company's Board of Directors administers the Incentive Plan and has the authority to select employees to receive awards under the Incentive Plan, determine the type, size and terms of awards granted under the Incentive Plan, interpret the

25



Incentive Plan and related awards and establish, amend and rescind rules and regulations relating to the Incentive Plan.

        Shares.    As approved by the Board and the Company's Members in 2001, a maximum of 300,000 Common Shares, par value $1.00 (subject to adjustment as provided in the Incentive Plan), may be issued under the Incentive Plan. The proposed amendments do not increase the number of Common Shares that may be issued under the Incentive Plan in the future. As of December 31, 2002, 234,000 Common Shares were still available for issuance under the Incentive Plan. As of the close of trading on March 21, 2003, the value of a Common Share was $339.50.

        Eligibility.    Any key employee of the Company or any of its subsidiaries designated by the Compensation Committee is eligible to receive an award under the Incentive Plan. As of the date of this Proxy Statement, the Company believes the number of key employees of the Company and its subsidiaries is approximately twenty.

        Performance Shares and Performance Units.    Performance shares are awards of phantom shares of the Company's Common Shares, some or all of which are earned if performance goals established by the Compensation Committee at the time of grant are satisfied over a specified award period. The value earned by an employee pursuant to an award of performance shares is generally equal to the number of award shares earned with respect to the award period multiplied by the fair market value of a Common Share on the date of payment. Performance shares are typically paid in cash, though they may be paid in Common Shares at the election of the Compensation Committee. The maximum amount of compensation that can be earned by an employee pursuant to an award of performance shares with respect to any particular award period of one year or more cannot exceed the value of 50,000 Common Shares.

        As amended, the Incentive Plan also provides for the grant of performance units. Performance units are awards of phantom units that are paid out if performance goals established by the Compensation Committee at the time of grant are satisfied over a specified award period. The value earned by an employee pursuant to an award of performance units is equal to the number of performance units earned over the award period multiplied by the unit value determined by the Compensation Committee, which is $100 increased by the percentage growth in value of the Company, any of its subsidiaries or any combination thereof over the award period. The maximum amount of compensation that can be earned by an employee with respect to an award of performance units during any award period of three years or more cannot exceed $10,000,000. This limit on the amount of compensation that can be earned with respect to performance units is prorated for award periods of less than three years.

        Awards of performance shares and performance units are forfeited if any employee terminates employment with the Company and its subsidiaries prior to the end of the award period for any reason other than death, disability or retirement.

        The performance goals that may be selected by the Compensation Committee with respect to performance share and performance unit awards are based upon one or more of the following criteria: (i) consolidated earnings before or after taxes (including earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization); (ii) net income; (iii) operating income; (iv) earnings per share; (v) book value per share; (vi) return on shareholders' equity; (vii) expense management; (viii) return on investment; (ix) improvements in capital structure; (x) share price; (xi) combined ratio; (xii) operating ratio; (xiii) profitability of an identifiable business unit or product; (xiv) maintenance or improvement of profit margins; (xv) market share; (xvi) revenues or sales; (xvii) costs; (xviii) cash flow; (xix) working capital; (xx) return on assets; (xxi) customer satisfaction; (xxii) employee satisfaction; and (xxiii) economic value per share (computed based on book value per share determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP") adjusted for changes in the intrinsic value of

26



assets and liabilities whose value differs from their GAAP carrying value). The foregoing criteria may, as determined by the Compensation Committee, relate to the Company, one or more of its subsidiaries or divisions, units, partnerships, joint ventures, minority investments, product lines or products, or any combination of the foregoing and may be applied on an absolute basis and/or be relative to one or more peer companies or indices or any combination thereof. At the time of an award of performance shares or performance units, the Compensation Committee establishes specific performance objectives that must be achieved with respect to the selected performance goal over the specified award period to earn some or all of a performance share or performance unit award. The Compensation Committee may calculate the relevant performance objective without regard to extraordinary items.

        The Compensation Committee may settle performance share or performance unit awards earned by an employee in cash or Common Shares and may elect to defer any such settlement to a later date.

        Options and Stock Appreciation Rights.    Options granted under the Incentive Plan may be non-qualified options or incentive stock options and are granted to eligible employees for no consideration. Options may be granted in tandem with stock appreciation rights or performance shares. An employee cannot receive options and stock appreciation rights on more than 10,000 Common Shares during any one year.

        The exercise price of each Common Share covered by an option will be not less than the greater of the fair market value of a Common Share as of the date the option is granted or the par value of a Common Share, provided that the exercise price of each Common Share of an incentive share option granted to certain employees with large shareholdings in the Company cannot be less than 110% of the fair market value of a Common Share on the date the option is granted. Each option becomes vested and exercisable at such times and subject to such terms and conditions as the Compensation Committee may, in its sole discretion, specify in the option agreement. Except in the event of an optionholder's death, disability or retirement or except as determined by the Board, each option will expire immediately, without any payment, upon the earlier of (1) the tenth anniversary of the option's grant date and (2) three months after the holder's termination of employment. Common Shares will not be delivered pursuant to an option's exercise until the optionholder pays the exercise price in full. Payment of the exercise price may be made in cash or check, by exchanging Common Shares owned by the optionholder or a combination of these methods.

        There are no federal tax consequences to optionholders, the Company or its subsidiaries in connection with the grant of an option. Upon the exercise of non-qualified options, optionholders will generally be subject to federal taxation on the aggregate difference in value between the option exercise price and the fair market value of the Common Shares with respect to which the option is exercised. That amount should be deductible for federal tax purposes with respect to employees of subsidiaries of the Company that are incorporated in the United States. A holder of an incentive stock option is generally not subject to federal taxation, and the Company and its subsidiaries are generally not entitled to a deduction, upon its exercise if the Common Shares obtained upon exercise are held for a specified period of time. Because the Company is incorporated in Bermuda, it cannot take a federal tax deduction for options exercised by its employees.

        Options on a total of 81,000 Common Shares have been granted under the Incentive Plan, all of which were issued in a one-time award in February 2000. The outstanding Options were granted at an exercise price equal to the underlying market value of Common Shares on the date of grant and vest 10% per year through 2009. The exercise price escalates on a straight-line basis by 6% per annum over the ten-year life of the options. Those options were granted to employees of the Company and its subsidiaries as follows: Raymond Barrette, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, 9,000; Steven E. Fass, President and Chief Executive Officer of Folksamerica, 9,000; David Staples, 9,000; Reid Campbell, 9,000; Kernan Oberting, 9,000; Michael Paquette, 9,000; Michael Tyburski, 9,000; and all other employees of the Company and its subsidiaries as a group, 18,000. As of March 21, 2003,

27



options on 56,265 Common Shares were still outstanding, options on 17,535 Common Shares have been exercised and options on 7,200 Common Shares have been forfeited.

        Stock appreciation rights can only be granted in tandem with options and give the holder the right to receive, in exchange for the cancellation of the option on the number of Common Shares with respect to which the stock appreciation right is exercised, a payment in an amount equal to the aggregate difference between the applicable exercise price and the fair market value of Common Shares with respect to which the right is exercised (which for this purpose only cannot exceed 150% of the applicable exercise price). Stock appreciation rights may be settled in cash or Common Shares.

        Restricted Stock.    The Compensation Committee may award shares of restricted stock, which are Common Shares that may not be sold, assigned, transferred, pledged, hypothecated or otherwise disposed of during a period designated by the Compensation Committee (the "restricted period"). The Company may purchase the Common Shares subject to an award of Restricted Stock at any price specified by the Compensation Committee at the time of grant if the holder's employment with the Company terminates before the end of the applicable restricted period for a reason other than death, disability or, in the discretion of the Board, retirement or other voluntary termination.

        Change in Control.    In the event of an "unfriendly change in control" (as defined in the Incentive Plan), all options generally become immediately vested and exercisable.

        In the event of certain terminations of an employee's employment with the Company or certain adverse changes to the Incentive Plan, in each case within 24 months of a "change in control" (as defined in the Incentive Plan), all options held by the employee immediately vest and become exercisable, awards of restricted stock held by the employee immediately vest and become unrestricted and the employee becomes entitled to a payment (as specified in the Incentive Plan) with respect to performance share or performance unit awards granted prior to the change in control.

        Certain Transactions.    The Compensation Committee may make equitable changes in the terms of outstanding awards granted under the Incentive Plan or in the number of Common Shares issuable under an award or under the Incentive Plan in the event of any change in the Company's outstanding Common Shares by reason of any stock split, stock dividend, recapitalization, merger, consolidation, reorganization, combination or exchange of Common Shares or other similar event.

        Amendment.    The Board may amend the Incentive Plan at any time, but no such amendment may, without the approval of the Company's Members (except as described in Certain Transactions, above) increase the number of Common Shares that may be issued under the Incentive Plan or change the class of employees eligible to participate in the Incentive Plan.

        Limitation on Company's Deduction.    Under Section 162(m) of the Code, the federal tax deduction for subsidiaries of the Company that are incorporated in the United States for all compensation paid to the Company's chief executive officer and certain other highly paid executive officers of the Company or its subsidiaries in any one year is limited to $1,000,000 per officer. Compensation that qualifies as performance-based compensation is exempt from this deduction limitation. White Mountains believes that the federal tax deductions arising from an officer's exercise of options or stock appreciation rights and amounts earned by an officer pursuant to performance share or performance unit awards should be exempt from this limitation. However, it is possible that in certain circumstances deductions arising from these awards would be subject to disallowance under Section 162(m) of the Code.

        A complete copy of the Incentive Plan, reflecting the proposed amendments thereto, has been provided herein as Appendix I.The Board recommends a vote FOR Proposal 5 which calls for approval of the technical amendments to the Incentive Plan.

28




PROPOSAL 6

APPROVAL OF THE APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORREGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

        Subject to Member approval, the Audit Committee of the Board has appointed PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP ("PwC") as White Mountains' Independent Auditorthe Company's independent registered public accounting firm for 2003.2004. Further, Members are being asked to authorize the Board, acting through the Audit Committee to negotiate and fix the remuneration to be paid to PwCPricewaterhouseCoopers LLP in connection with the services to be provided to the Company for 2003.2004. Representatives from PwCPricewaterhouseCoopers LLP will attend the 20032004 Annual Meeting, will be provided with the opportunity to make a statement and will be available to answer appropriate questions.

        PwCPricewaterhouseCoopers LLP has served as the Company's Independent Auditorindependent registered public accounting firm for three4 years, as Folksamerica's Independent Auditorindependent registered public accounting firm for more than 20 years, and as OneBeacon's Independent Auditorindependent registered public accounting firm for more than 25 years.

        The Board recommends a vote FOR Proposal 65 approving the appointment of PwCPricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as White Mountains'the Company's Independent AuditorRegistered Public Accounting Firm for 2003.2004.


OTHER MATTERS

Manner of Voting Proxies

        Common Shares represented by all valid proxies received will be voted in the manner specified in the proxies. Where specific choices are not indicated, the Common Shares represented by all valid proxies received will be voted FOR each of the proposals named earlier in this Proxy Statement.

        In the case of Common Shares held in employee benefit plans, the trustee will typically vote all Common Shares within such plans in direct proportion to those Common Shares actually voted by plan participants.

Should any matter not described above be acted upon at the meeting, the persons named in the proxy card will vote in accordance with their judgment. The Board knows of no other matters which are to be considered at the 20032004 Annual Meeting.



Votes Required for Approval

        Unless indicated otherwise above, theThe proposals require the affirmative vote of a majority of the voting power held by holders of Common Shares present at the 20032004 Annual General Meeting, in person or by proxy, provided a quorum is present.

Inspectors of Election

        EquiServe Trust Company, N.A., P.O. Box 43069, Providence, Rhode Island 02940-3069, has been appointed as Inspectors of Election for the 20032004 Annual Meeting. Representatives of EquiServe will attend the 20032004 Annual Meeting to receive votes and ballots, supervise the counting and tabulating of all votes and ballots and determine the results of the vote.

Costs of Solicitation

        The solicitation of proxies will be made primarily by mail, however, directors, officers, employees and agents of the Company may also solicit proxies by telephone, telegram or personal interview. Solicitation costs will be paid by the Company. Upon request, the Company will reimburse banks, brokerage houses and other custodians, nominees and fiduciaries for their reasonable expenses incurred in forwarding proxy materials to their principals.

Delivery of Documents to Shareholders Sharing an Address

        The Company may have delivered only one copy of this document to two or more shareholders who share an address. Those shareholders who desire additional copies of this document or would like to receive separate copies of this document in the future should contact their bank, broker or other holder of record or the Corporate Secretary at the address presented under "Available Information" below.

Communicating with the Board

        Members, employees and others interested in communicating directly with the Board or any of the Board's committees should write to the addressee, c/o the Corporate Secretary, at the address presented under "Available Information" below.

Available Information

        The Company is subject to the informational reporting requirements of the Exchange Act of 1934. In accordance therewith, the Company files reports, proxy statements and other information with the SEC.The Company will provide to any Member, upon request and without charge, copies of all

29



documents (excluding exhibits unless specifically requested) filed by the Company with the SEC. Written or telephone requests should be directed to the Corporate Secretary, White Mountains Insurance Group, Ltd., 80 South Main Street, Hanover, New Hampshire, 03755, telephone number (603) 640-2200. Additionally, all such documents are physically available at the Company's registered office at Clarendon House, 2 Church Street, Hamilton, HM 11 Bermuda and are available for viewing atwww.whitemountains.comshortly after such material is electronically filed with or furnished to the SEC.

Offices of the Company

        The Company's headquarters is located at Crawford House, 23 ChurchThe Bank of Butterfield Building, 42 Reid Street, 6th Floor, Hamilton, HM 11,12, Bermuda, (with a mailing address of 12 Church Street, Suite 322, Hamilton HM 11, Bermuda), its principal executive office is located at 80 South Main Street, Hanover, New Hampshire, 03755, and its registered office is located at Clarendon House, 2 Church Street, Hamilton, HM 11, Bermuda.



Proposals by Members for the 20042005 Annual Meeting of Members

        Member proposals (other than those proposals to nominate persons as directors)nominating director candidates for which the procedures are outlined on page 7) must be received in writing by the Secretary of the Company no later than December 11, 20036, 2004 and must comply with the requirements of the SEC in order to be considered for inclusion in the Company's proxy statement relating to the Annual Meeting to be held in 2004.2005.


30



Appendix IExhibit A

White Mountains
Long-Term
Incentive Plan
(as amended) Insurance Group, Ltd.

1.    PURPOSEAudit Committee Charter

I.     Purpose

II.    Membership

19


P
R
O
X
Y
HAS YOUR ADDRESS CHANGED?
 WHITE MOUNTAINS INSURANCE GROUP, LTD.

Proxy Solicited on Behalf of the Board of Directors of

the Company for the Annual General Meeting to be Held May 19, 2003
The undersigned hereby appoints Raymond Barrette and John D. Gillespie, and each of them, proxies with full power of substitution, to vote all Common Shares of the undersigned at the 2003 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders to be held May 19, 2003, and at any adjournment thereof, upon all subjects that may properly come before the meeting including the matters described in the proxy statement furnished herewith, subject to any directions indicated on the reverse of this card or below. If no directions are given, the proxies will vote FOR the Election of the Company's Directors, FOR the Election of Directors of Fund American Re., FOR the Election of Directors to any New Non-United States Operating Subsidiaries, FOR the Issuance of Common Shares Upon Conversion of Convertible Preference Shares, FOR Technical Amendments to the Long-Term Incentive Plan, FOR Approval of the Appointment of Independent Auditor, and at their discretion on any other matter that may properly come before the meeting.DO YOU HAVE ANY COMMENTS?.

Your vote for the Election of the Company's Directors may be indicated on the reverse side. The following Directors are being nominated at this meeting for election to terms ending in 2006.



(Change of address/comments)



        Raymond Barrette        Howard L. Clark, Jr.
        Robert P. Cochran        Arthur Zankel



Your vote for the election of Fund American Re's directors may be indicated on the reverse side. The following directors are being nominated to serve until their resignation or removal from office.


(If you have written in the above space, please mark the
corresponding box on the reverse side of this card.)

Raymond Barrette


Anders Henriksson


Elinor M. Lucas (alt.)


Steven E. FassSheila E. Nicoll

Your vote for the election of the directors of any new non-United States subsidiaries may be indicated on the reverse side. The following directors are being nominated to serve until their resignation or removal from office.
        Raymond Barrette        Steven E. Fass



Your vote is important! Please sign and date on the reverse side and return promptly in the enclosed postage-paid envelope or otherwise to White Mountains Insurance Group, Ltd., c/o EquiServe Trust Company, Post Office Box 8085, Edison, New Jersey 08818-9052.


 


PLEASE RETURN THIS PROXY PROMPTLY IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE










LOGO

C/O EQUISERVE TRUST COMPANY N.A.
P.O. BOX 8694
EDISON, NJ 08818-8694


DETACH HERE IF YOU ARE RETURNING YOUR PROXY CARD BY MAIL

ý SEE REVERSE SIDE
Please mark
votes as in
this example.

ý
Please mark your
votes as in this
example.

This proxyProxy, when properly executed will be voted in the manner directed herein. If no directions are made, this proxy will be voted FOR Proposals 1, 2, 3, 4 5 and 6.5.

The Board of Directors recommends a vote "FOR" Proposals 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6.
  FORWITHHELD  FORWITHHELD  FORWITHHELD  FORAGAINSTABSTAIN
1.Election of Company Directorsoo2.Election of Directors of Fund American Reoo3.Election of Directors to any New Non-US Subsidiariesoo4.Issuance of Common Sharesooo

FOR, except vote withheld from the following nominee(s):

FOR, except vote withheld from the following nominee(s):

FOR, except vote withheld from the following nominee(s):

 

 

FOR

AGAINST

ABSTAIN
 
 
 
5.Technical Amendments to the Long-Term Incentive Planooo

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Change of Address

 

 

 

FOR

AGAINST

ABSTAIN
        Comments on Reverse Sideo6.Appointment of Independent Auditorsooo

        The Board of Directors recommends a vote "FOR" Proposals 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5.

1. Elect Directors to Class I with a term ending in 2007 2. Election of Board of Directors of Sirius International Insurance Corporation 3. Election of Board of Directors of Fund American Reinsurance Company, Ltd. and Scandinavian Reinsurance Company Ltd.

 

 

Nominees: (01) Bruce R. Berkowitz,
(02) Steven E. Fass, (03) Edith E. Holiday,
(04) Lowndes A. Smith, (05) Joseph S. Steinberg

 

 

 

Nominees: (01) Steven E. Fass, (02) Laks Ek,
(03) Gert Lindberg, (04) Goran Thorstensson

 

 

 

Nominees: (01) Steven E. Fass, (02) Anders Henriksson,
(03) Mark Kaplen,
(04) Michael E. Maloney,
(05) Goran Thorstensson,
(06) Michael E. Tyburski
FOR
o
WITHHELD
o
FOR
o
WITHHELD
o
FOR
o
WITHHELD
o

For, except vote withheld from the following nominee(s):


For, except vote withheld from the following nominee(s):


For, except vote withheld from the following nominee(s):








4.Election of Board of Directors of any New Non-United States Operating Subsidiary, as Designated by the Company's Board of DirectorsFOR
o
WITHHELD
o
Nominees: (01) Raymond Barrette,
(02) Steven E. Fass

 

 

The signer hereby revokes all proxies heretofore given by


For, except vote withheld from the signer to vote at said meeting or any adjournment thereof.following nominee(s):









5.


Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm


FOR
o


AGAINST
o


ABSTAIN
o



CHANGE OF ADDRESS AND/OR COMMENTS MARK HERE


o

 

 

Please sign this proxy exactly as name appears hereon. Joint ownersWhen shares are held by joint tenants, both should each sign. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, trustee or guardian, please give full title as such.








Signature: SIGNATURE(S)
 DATE
Date:

Signature:
Date:



QuickLinks

Table of Contents
WHITE MOUNTAINS INSURANCE GROUP, LTD. NOTICE OF 20032004 ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING OF MEMBERS TO BE HELD MAY 19, 2003
WHITE MOUNTAINS INSURANCE GROUP, LTD. PROXY STATEMENT
PROCEDURES FOR NOMINATINGPROPOSAL 1
ELECTION OF THE COMPANY'S DIRECTORS
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
VOTING SECURITIES AND PRINCIPAL HOLDERS THEREOF Voting Rights of Members
Principal Holders of Common Shares
Beneficial Stock Ownership of Directors and Executive Officers
COMPENSATION OF DIRECTORS
COMPENSATION OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS Summary Compensation Table
Option Grants in Last Fiscal Year
Aggregated Option Exercises in Last Fiscal Year and Fiscal Year-End Option Values
Long-Term Incentive Plans—Awards in Last Fiscal Year
Equity Compensation Plan Table
COMPENSATION PLANS
REPORTSREPORT OF THE COMMITTEES ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANT FEES BILLED BY THE COMPANY'S INDEPENDENT AUDITOR FORAND SERVICES PERFORMED IN 2002
MEMBER RETURN GRAPH
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION IN COMPENSATION DECISIONS
COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 16(a) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT
PROPOSAL 2 ELECTION OF DIRECTORS OF FUND AMERICAN RESIRIUS INTERNATIONAL INSURANCE CORPORATION ("SIRIUS INTERNATIONAL")
PROPOSAL 3 ELECTION OF DIRECTORS OF FUND AMERICAN REINSURANCE COMPANY, LTD. ("FUND AMERICAN RE") AND SCANDINAVIAN REINSURANCE COMPANY LTD. ("SCANDINAVIAN RE")
PROPOSAL 4 ELECTION OF DIRECTORS TO ANY NEW NON-UNITED STATES OPERATING SUBSIDIARIES
PROPOSAL 4 ISSUANCE OF COMMON SHARES UPON CONVERSION OF CONVERTIBLE PREFERENCE SHARES
PROPOSAL 5 TECHNICAL AMENDMENTS TO THE LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN
PROPOSAL 6 APPROVAL OF THE APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORREGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
OTHER MATTERS
PROXY